No they would got killed if Zidane and Henry stayed in the game but Italy has to knock Henry out cold wheres the red card and that stupid italian made a racist comment about Zidane he got what he deserved
2006-07-09 10:27:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by RJW 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i hate to see a game end like that. france dominated play most of that game and to lose in pks and without henry, zidane, viera, ribery, its very unfortunate. and trezeguet missing by less than an inch sucks. italy had a lot of luck on their side in a few of this years games (think usa, think australia, think today), although u cant deny they still won it all. very good world cup all around though, time to get on with life. lol
zidane is still one of the best players to ever play the game
2006-07-09 10:35:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by cornholio9631 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes it was fair it was a really fair game. and france could have won if zidane or henry kick.
2006-07-09 10:31:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Huh?!?!? Italy scored two goals!! The second was taken back for a bad call from the ref. Not to mention that the only goal by the French was based off of a penalty kick that was faked. That guy made no contact.
2006-07-10 16:27:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by sobekBOS 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the best team won, the penalty in the first half was BS and that game was going to be 1-0 to Italy , anyways
2006-07-09 10:56:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nestor 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no it wasn't fair because i think matarazzi made Zidane mad (even though it was a barbaric move) matarazzi said something barbaric!!
and yes if Zadane was playing he would have defiantly won the worldcup!!! (esp in the PKs!)
2006-07-09 10:29:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by TWIX 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, it wasnt.
france lost because zidane is a stupid guy.
he deserved that they loose.
2006-07-10 00:54:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dont think soo
2006-07-09 10:29:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by GuRiYa 3
·
0⤊
0⤋