English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please don`t give me the evolution theory because I just don`t believe that in my heart,seriously!Please!!!!!!!!!!

2006-07-09 10:06:04 · 5 answers · asked by pumpkin 4 in Entertainment & Music Movies

5 answers

It has to do with discoveries of so-called "human" remains. The skulls of those remains tend to resemble, due to the larger forehead, apes/monkeys. The key word here is "resemble". Besides the skulls, there is nothing in the fossil record that shows modern man came from ape-like creatures. The famous skeletal remains that have been found and widely publicized, were later proven to be hoaxes. Mix and match skeletal remains to try to promote the discoverers and evolution. What I find interesting is that millions of textbooks are being used in schools that teach evolution with these de-bunked findings! Why are the schools teaching FALSE information??

Check this out:

Example 1 - Piltdown Man

A good example of this is what is now known as the Piltdown fraud, in which some fossil experts found some modern human remains, yet they altered the bones to make them appear to be “the missing link.” The skull was from a human and the jaw was from an ape. For forty years this forgery was hailed as the “missing link” until it was exposed as forgery in 1953.

How was it that so many scientists were fooled by this? One evolutionist named Roger Lewin commented on this in his book Bones of Contention:
“How is it that trained men, the greatest experts of their day, could look at a set of modern human bones—the cranial fragments—and “see” a clear simian signature in them; and “see” in an ape’s jaw the unmistakable signs of humanity? The answers, inevitably, have to do with the scientists’ expectations and their effects on the interpretation of data… Data are just as often molded to fit preferred conclusions. And the interesting question then becomes “What shapes the preference of an individual or group of researchers?” not “What is the truth?”

These men wanted to prove evolution so badly that they let this mold their findings into what they expected, instead of what was the truth. This seems to happen quite often.



Example 2 - Nebraska Man

In 1922 a complete illustration of a prehistoric man and woman was fabricated after the find of one tooth. Later it was found to be the tooth of an extinct cousin of a wild pig.



Example 3 - Rhodesian Man

Skull found in 1921 and later determined to be a skull from modern man.



Example 4 - Orce Man

Small fragment of a skull found in 1982 and was allegedly from the skull of a prehistoric boy. It was later identified as a fragment of a 6-month-old donkey skull.



Example 5 - Java Man
In 1891, leg bone, tooth, and skull cap from the supposed “missing link.” Leg bone and tooth were human, skull cap was from a giant gibbon monkey.



Example 6 - AEGYPTOPITHECUS ZEUXIS
Eventually admitted by evolutionists to be an ape skull



Example 7 - DRYOPITHECUS AFRICANUS
Eventually admitted by evolutionists to be an ape skull



Example 8 - RAMAPITHECUS BREVIROSTRIS
Eventually admitted by evolutionists to be an ape skull



Examples 9,10,11 - AUSTRALOPITHECUS, HOMO HABILIS, AND HOMO ERECTUS
These three hominids are supposedly contemporaries, and man’s
artifacts have been found in areas BENEATH these hominid’s dwelling sites.

Listen to what Duane Gish wrote in 1995:
“If AUSTRALOPITHECUS, HOMO HABILIS, AND HOMO ERECTUS existed contemporaneously, how could one have been ancestral to another? And how could any of these creatures be ancestral to Man, when Man’s artifacts are found at a lower stratigraphic level, directly underneath, and thus earlier in time to these supposed ancestors of Man?”


According to Ernst Mayr, the famed evolutionary taxonomist from Harvard, “The HOMO ERECTUS stage is characterized by a body skeleton which, so far as we know, does not differ from that of modern man in any essential point.”



[i.e., Homo Erectus is actually the skeleton of man, not some human ancestor.]


Even after all this, the evolutionists and other non-creation groups push their agenda....with tax payers dollars to boot!!!

"Thinking themselves to be wise they become fools"....

2006-07-09 10:50:42 · answer #1 · answered by Mrs. Mojo Jojo 3 · 0 1

Just because you don't believe it in your heart doesn't mean that the reat of the world doesn't. That is why cavemen look like apes because they are just barely evloved from the ape.

2006-07-09 10:16:26 · answer #2 · answered by Kookie M 5 · 0 0

Evolution exists whether you're capable of believing in it or not. Early man looked very much like "cave men" you see in modern motion pictures.


jeez, go visit a museum or something.

2006-07-09 10:10:16 · answer #3 · answered by ratboy 7 · 0 0

Then pick up a science book. They base the look on the skulls they found. Which had long, flat foreheads, etc.

2006-07-09 10:10:37 · answer #4 · answered by Bethany 4 · 0 0

Well, what do you think they should look like? Maybe you should talk to the people who do the movies and tell them what cavemen are supposed to look like.

2006-07-09 10:10:02 · answer #5 · answered by Terisu 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers