Wimbledon, do you like that Federer won?

Question

Do you guys like Nadal or Federer better? I prefer Federer but do you guys think that he should keep playing and if so, for how long?

Answer 1

federer proved at winbledon that he is the best on grass as nadal proved in the french open that he is the best on clay so totaly different but both extraordinary players as for federer he can still play a good period of years from now on,maybe 5 or 6 in his best shape,still brilliant final indeed

Answer 2

I like them both, Federer played a great match, and held his composure, he won the first set so easily 6-0 in 24 minutes, but Nadal really made it a contest losing the second set, just barely 7-6. and then he won the 3rd set 7-6, but he ran out of gas in the fourth, and Federer won his 4th straight Wimbledon. Nadal has now proven that he can play on grass, he beat Federer earlier this year in Dubai, and that was on a hard-court, so Nadal CAN play on any surface, not just clay. I'm very proud of Nadal's effort, and he will be a tough customer to deal with at Wimbledon for years to come.

If Federer is healthy, he could play for another 7-8 years easy. He's only 24 years old.

Answer 3

I am very pleased that Federer won. It's great to see his record setting grass-court streak capped with a fourth straight Wimbledon title. It was also great to see him get the monkey off his back and beat Nadal. The losing streak was getting out of control. It was also starting to raise questions over the legitimacy of his #1 ranking. So, all in all, great to see him win.
Of the two, I prefer Federer. Nadal is more animated, but Federer's more varied game makes him better to watch. Full credit to Rafa for being so gracious in defeat. Classy stuff.
As far as how long Federer should keep playing, injuries aside, it just depends on his level of play and motivation. When he starts losing more frequently, and not putting himself in the running for majors, that would be a good time to go. It would be hard for a great champion to feel all that enthusiastic about a couple of Grand Slam quater-finals here and there. He won't want to be remembered as the sad old guy who played way past his prime.
Until then, we have plenty more great matches to enjoy, and maybe a fantastic rivalry as well.

Answer 4

I love that Federer won! I wasnt pulling for him all that much when he played Roddick a few years ago, but I wanted him to beat Nadal soo badly!! He had only won against him 1 other time and the 2nd time just happened to be Wimbledon finals!!

Answer 5

I'm glad that Federer won Wimbledon, but I was kinda hoping that Nadal would win.

Answer 6

Federer may have won this time but i still LOVE Nadal. Federer should continue playing for as long as he could he is a gr8 player.

Answer 7

NOOOO i didnt like it when federer won
i LOVE nadal i almost cried at the end but I'm soo happy so for Nadal he did awesome... i answered soooo many Federer/Nadal questions last week (hopeing Nadal would win)...and I'm sad to so say my man Nadal didn't win...but that's only because he was on grass but i still believe he will have a great future on grass later on
Plus in overall matches Federer still loses to Nadal...haha...lol

Answer 8

I am THRILLEEEEEEEEEEEEED that he won. He deserves it.He's truly the master of grass. He plays magnificent tennis and he is one of the best players ever. Oh and I totally prefer Federer because Nadal can only play GRATE on clay but Federer plays brilliantly on any surface.

Answer 9

Federer and Nadal are both great players...they both played a great game, the rivalery is amicable...i'm proud of Nadal because this was his first Wimbledon and he got so far! and i'm also proud of Federe because he defended his title! great ******* match yo!

Answer 10

I like Federer better. I so think that he should keep playing for at least 5 more yrs.