Running Time: 2 hrs. 34 min.
Brandon Routh played a great Superman and reminded me a lot of Christopher Reeves
Kevin Spacey played a better Lex Luthor than Gene Hackman.
Kate Bosworth was not a very good Lois Lane I thought Margot Kidder played her better.
all in all I thought the movie was very good. I thought Kevin played Lex much more ruthless like he is in the comic books.
2006-07-10 13:12:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by kellyrv_bsa 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
It's good on its own merit. Lot's of people (critics) are comparing it to the other Superman films. It's entertaining and I suggest you see it despite all the reviews. The run time is about 2 hours and 35 minutes.
If you want a real treat I also suggest Pirate of the Carribean: Dead Man's Chest. However I suggest you see the original before doing so.
2006-07-09 14:25:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by blu_dragon_1004 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here in the Philippines, I am hearing negative reviews from our local movie reviewer. But no matter how bad it is, I will still watch this movie because Superman is Superman. He's part of my childhood.
2006-07-09 14:30:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by answer me 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes the new superman is good. I enjoyed it alot. The best part is the visuals. Bryan Singer did a good job in directing. Brandon Routh did a very good job also. The movie is 2hrs and 45mins long or so. Some say it's too long but for me, if the movie is good I dont mind, I get my moneys worth.
2006-07-09 14:27:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sam L 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I didn't realize they had movie theatres in the swamps of Mississippi. I heard it was ok and its almost 2 1/2 hours long
2006-07-09 23:21:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Chad 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say **** the reviews. If I ever wanna see a movie I see it. I dont care what other people think about it.
2006-07-09 14:27:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by blakefabian2003 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
160 minutes. I've heard mixed reviews. Its making alot of money, so it must not be that bad.
2006-07-09 14:24:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the original superman movies were classic. remakes are always bad except for harry potter and lord of the rings
2006-07-09 14:25:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i havent watched it but hubby says it is great, better than the 1st
2006-07-09 14:25:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by momtano3 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
it was good till the ending. then it went haywired.
2006-07-09 14:26:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by M C 1
·
0⤊
0⤋