more awareness and media coverage
2006-07-09 06:43:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by sunshine25 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
genocide is truely a cruel and barbaric act that still lingers in the hearts of men to crush there enemys only when the hearts of wicked men are made whole will genocide stop the un can do nothing they wont even try in some cases the best way for a weak people to avoid be killed is to grow strong and dont let them selves be slaughtered fight back even if you die you died a freeman but to die a freeman then killed like a pig if your enemy has better weapons you must become smarter and fight them on your terms as to make there better weapons useless
2006-07-09 06:45:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by abramelin_the_wise_mage 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, genocide could be stopped with a stronger United Nations, one that's not so tolerant of dictatorship and human rights violations.
The problem is that, as long as countries like China, Russia or the US still have absolute veto power on the UN Security Council, possitive UN resolutions will continue to be stopped dead in their tracks.
The root cause is, as always, bussiness interests. Countries like China or the US won't stop their arms sales to Sudan, since it means profits to them. Likewise, most western countries won't dare to condemn China in its silent genocide against its Ughiur and Tibetan minorities, for fear of losing bussiness contracts and the possibility of trade agreements for their multinational corporate lobbists.
Either the UN needs to be reformed, or the world itself turned upside down. Corporate lobbies are the by-product of a capitalist world society that runs on the basis of achieving short-term profits for some, and not long-term welfare for all.
2006-07-09 06:47:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Firefox 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think if they actually acknowledged when Genocide was happening in the first place, that might help.
2006-07-09 06:42:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by stillafeminist87 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Morally conversing, sure, states must be in contact with preventing genocide, yet politically conversing, states received't accomplish that except that is of their perfect interests to finish that. many human beings imagine that we did not intrude in Rwanda simply by political climate contained in the U. S. following the failure in Somalia. extra to which, weaker states which commit those crimes many times get off scot-loose because they're aligned with extra efficient states.
2016-11-06 02:30:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only thing, and I do mean ONLY thing that the world can do to stop genocide is to have all of us turn our lives over to Jesus our Christ, and live accordingly. We can relate to Jesus in prayer and regular study, and I do emphasize study, of His Bible. Anything else is just like pissing in the wind. God Bless you.
2006-07-09 07:03:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The UN is impotent, it can do nothing. Getting rid of corruption is the number one thing to start with.
Corruption in any form, of any country, or any government should be a capital offense.
2006-07-09 06:43:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing. The UN is always to late. It already happend once they come into action.
2006-07-09 06:42:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Puppy Zwolle 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that if we target terrorist leaders and nations and get them to stop their terrible acts, we might stop genocide.
2006-07-09 06:59:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by BigK1118 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
By pressing people who do it in front of the whole world in Ghaza.
2006-07-09 06:44:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by ??!!??!!?? 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Grow peace people
2006-07-09 07:01:51
·
answer #11
·
answered by bogota1001 1
·
0⤊
1⤋