What do you think? Did bush, Retired Iraqi Supreme general Sada, and the CIA lie about weapons of mass destruction? if so, explain how certain weapons of mass destruction do not meet the criteria of being weapons of mass destruction. Be aware that your conspiracy may be a conspiracy in itself.
2006-07-09 05:14:23 · 10 answers · asked by Doggzilla 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
well of course there arent any weapons in Iraq.... and OJ is innocent!
2006-07-09 05:33:13 · answer #1 · answered by david waterstreet 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Its not a conspiracy if everyone in the world is telling the same lie.
Sadam himself allowed the mistake to continue for his own benefit. Before the war only the UN Inspectors said no weapons were in Iraq.
2006-07-09 05:20:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure. As Wraeth stated, many remains of Iraq's WMD software were got here upon by technique of US troops after the invasion. even as they received't have had an energetic software, they nevertheless had remnants. And between the findings of the Duelfer record became that the Hussein regime meant to restart their WMD software (both Nuclear and Chemical, no longer organic and organic, in spite of the indisputable fact that) once sanctions ended (which I parent may were about 2005 or '06).
2016-11-30 22:27:15 · answer #3 · answered by ambach 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's important and being minimized in the media. Because no nuclear weapons were found, people have now begun an attempt in trying to decipher what Bush meant. He was very clear when he said WMD's, he did not elaborate, did not detail. Small minds which have been defeated can't wrap their heads around the facts.
2006-07-09 05:25:47 · answer #4 · answered by kathy059 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don;t believe weapons of mass destruction have been found. When bush was talking about wmd's he was talking about nuclear weapons or huge stockpiles of biological weapons that could be used to kill hundreds of thousands of people, fact is nothing like this has been found....
2006-07-09 05:18:59 · answer #5 · answered by brett_day2002 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is the actual truth about Iraq on any level? Why is it so easy to send troops over to Iraq, maybe because they are your children? But the midterm elections are coming so we must make something up that the voters will believe to justify the biggest mistake made in our country's history...
2006-07-09 05:19:47 · answer #6 · answered by Mary B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I could have found a needle in a haystack by now! Whatever happened to Bin Laden and Gas that was .99 per gallon! That's what really matters.
2006-07-09 05:19:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am still worried about the U.S.A. having weapons of mass destruction.
2006-07-09 05:18:28 · answer #8 · answered by snoweagleltd 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no WMD's in Iraq. It's all a sham and has always been just to keep that right-wing, Christian-fanatic in the office.
2006-07-09 05:17:59 · answer #9 · answered by evercyn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think if there were WMD's there, they were moved before the US went in.
What was found recently was old and not what the President was refering to when he said there was a threat from WMD's.
2006-07-09 05:21:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋