2006-07-09 03:29:59 · 36 answers · asked by birchlane2 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yes not just this country but the world. there would be no wars and no one would starve, you would all have to play nice........
2006-07-09 03:31:55 · answer #1 · answered by angelcake 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
My country IS
Nauru is a small island, out president is Mrs. Nappulatu Nagahengilatau. A mother :)
2006-07-09 03:37:41 · answer #2 · answered by english_n_proud91 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does not necessarily need to be a mother. But definitely a woman (NOT HILLARY!) Women have a higher tolerance level than men, are more passive, and do not have the innate need to show everyone what a "big man" they are with guns. Women would be more likely to negotiate extensively before initating a war, they know how to budget on a shoestring (thus cutting the deficit, not adding to it) We don't have to have bigger guns & better toys than everybody else as we are not concerned with overcompensating in one area what we lack in another. A woman would be more concerned about getting HER house in order before she went sticking her nose in business that was not hers. And if ALL countries were run by women, there would likely be monthly or quarterly tea-parties to resolve desputes before they got out of hand. Not this, "he hit me so I'm going to bomb him to show him how tough I am BS!" Granted, women would be more nuturing to the concerns of the world, but smart enough to not cause trillions of dollars of damage to another country just to spend trillions more fixing it back up for them while the citizens of this country suffer with their needs falling on deaf ears.
2006-07-09 03:48:59 · answer #3 · answered by cutedragonwizardess 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If our home can be run by mothers , why not our country as well?
2006-07-09 03:32:14 · answer #4 · answered by Bolan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No country should be run only by one type of person. It takes alot of different people to live in a country and it takes alot of different people to run a country.
2006-07-09 03:36:04 · answer #5 · answered by experiencedmotherof4 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's dangerous territory you're walking into, anytime you suggest the country should be run by only one group. For democracy to work, we need a varied set of opinions from everyone who cares about how our country is run.
2006-07-09 03:32:05 · answer #6 · answered by foofoo19472 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Now THERE'S an idea! Whose mothers, though? Jewish mothers? Mothers of Invention? Mothers Against Drunk Driving? Mothers of crack babies? Soccer Moms? Mothers of soldiers serving in Afghanistan and Iraq? Mothers of the Year?
2006-07-09 03:36:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which country since there are X number of countries represented on Yahoo! Answers.
2006-07-09 03:31:49 · answer #8 · answered by Cali Dude 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who says it isnt, even guys like Bush have been a son at some point of their life where they became the way they are.....
Its just that the mom rulers are smart enough to stay in the background so the sons get the blame
2006-07-09 03:33:02 · answer #9 · answered by ganja_claus 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just as long as George. W Bush. and his stupid Republicans aren't running the show
2006-07-09 03:31:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We definitely need a female president - they are more detail oriented and probably less likely to be a jackass like all the other presidents we've had since Eisenhower (he wasn't).
2006-07-09 06:20:34 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋