explain the big bang theory "in the beginning there was nothing and even that exploded" possible???

Answer 1

God said it and "Bang" it happened!

Answer 2

The scientific theory of the big bang states that all the matter/energy in the universe was compressed into an extremely tight hot ball smaller than a fingernail, at the big bang it rapidly expanded and is still expanding today at an ever increasing rate. Whether this is correct or not remains to be proven, there are other scientific theories involving multiple universes and colliding "branes" in 12 dimensions. The real question is how did something come out of nothing? Everything we have experience has a cause, things do not spontaneously jump into existence. So the only other possibility is that there is something that has existed forever, something that was not caused or created but just is. According to the big bang theory, which is commonly accepted the universe had a beginning a is about 14 billion years old, so the universe is not the uncaused cause. Humans have labelled the Uncased cause, the thing that is simply existent: God. No matter the theory of creation you will always need something that was not created as is if there was nothing in the beginning, there would be nothing now.

Answer 3

Like stated above the big bang theory in no way says that "there was nothing and even that exploded" the theory is that everything was at that one point at one time and then exploded.

Answer 4

The big bang theory in no way says that in the beginning there was nothing. In fact it says that in the beginning all of the energy that ever will be was all in one place at the same "time".

Answer 5

It dates back to George Lemaitre. He proposed the idea even as experimental effects indicated that the universe become increasing. He turned right into a Catholic, a Jesuit from Belgium. one in all his factors about why it agreed with Catholicism become that it gave God a hazard to finish slightly coming up. do not ignore that the purely complication-free theory on the time become the universe had existed in a tender state invariably. @ Alexis. Morkie actual has it accurate. Hawking is utilising the pole analogy to communicate about that the universe has no limitations. in case you bypass south and save going you ultimately end up going north even although you probably did not replace the direction you've been travelling on the exterior. He perspectives the start and end of the universe an same way. in simple terms accessible places for us to apply for reference factors.

Answer 6

Imagine a black hole, the size that can slurp all universe in itself, or most of it, and end all life as is known. Now imagine it as a vacuum cleaner bag... stretching... stretching, too much matter inside, and... bursting. There's your big bang theory explained 'for dummies' style.

Answer 7

All matter was energy in a black hole. It finally exploded, thus the universe, which is still expanding and cooling down. This was billions of earth years ago. There is no end in sight.

Answer 8

Go buy the book "A Brief History Of Nearly Everything".

Answer 9

even nasa people are still guessing this stuff and i m sure if they come to some conclusion its going to far away from the reality so when the things are so complicated why do you put answer users to such mind bogling stuff any ways if there are some answers to it i too am intersted to know that

Answer 10

"A brief history of time" from Stephen Hawkins will give you one point of view that is very elaborated. Of course, it still needs answers ... If anyone really did know how everything started....then that person would be ruling us all, right?

Answer 11

I don't think it's possible either.

And if in the beggining, there wasn't nothing, then where did all the energy and matter and stuff come from?