Why doesn't the United Nations in New York city make some real genuine policy changes? Ones that will actually do this world some true good? Such as to establish international laws making it a international criminal offence to invade, commit acts of violence and aggression and occupy another nation? To set up these laws, international courts and police/ military to enforce these laws? Why doesn't the U.N. make international laws against any nation on the whole earth aquiring and maintaining nuclear weapons? Weapons of the earths destruction? Why doesn't the United Nations fullfil its mandate to protect the world from wars and aggressions one nation against another like it is supposed to? This comment is from "New World Order Organization of Nations" with the organizations web page located at the web site at; canadiansovereigntyandprosperityparty.com
2006-07-08 22:11:35 · 9 answers · asked by Dream Police 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Source; Canadian Sovereignty and Prosperity Party .com
2006-07-08 22:15:06 · update #1
If that should ever happen there would be a lot of problems!!! It would end up in one leader over the whole world..... and Biblicly speaking.... I don't want to see it anytime soon.... along with peace in the Holy grounds.....
and, How else are we going to get rid of rulers who abuse their own people, such as that North Korean guy... Hitler..... Sadam.... Osama..... u really need a reality check.... its not about fighting just to fight,
and that is how us Americans got our freedom... and thats what we try to help the other countries get and keep.........
u must be a libatard!
2006-07-08 22:18:27 · answer #1 · answered by steveangela1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, for many reasons. You want to try and take the nukes away from America? Which force is going to do it for you? Banning them is only efffective if you can pull it off, otherwise you end up looking like a toothless bureaucracy, which pretty much the UN has done time and again without banning WMDs.
The UN already found the invasion of Iraq to be illegal, that is, not multilaterally supported, and what did the US do? Basically it told the UN to F*** itself with a rake.
The UN isn't an effective organisation, but then, no massive committee ever wil be.
2006-07-09 05:19:42 · answer #2 · answered by corpuscollossus 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
United States of America. Britain. France. Russia. China. The Five Most Powerful Nations In The World. Why on planet earth shouldn't WE the Powerful decide what's law, what isn't. We own the world. We are the world. Period.
2006-07-09 05:37:23 · answer #3 · answered by erlish 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because wars are sometimes justified. And if one country does break the law and fight a war, what would you punish them with, war?
And in today's world of un-officially declared wars, what constitutes a war vs a peacekeeping or humanitarian action?
Would Somalian aid in 92/93 have been against the law in your left wing paradise fantasyland? Because to help the UN partner nations had to fight the warlords.
The problem with idealogicial left wing loony groups like yours is that the ideas are never workable, and not applicable to real life scenarios.
2006-07-09 05:23:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are plenty of treaty's and limits like the Non Proliferation Nuclear Ban Treaty.
The problem is, the US thinks it is above the law and skirts the UN!
What kind of example do you think that set for the world??
2006-07-09 05:33:59 · answer #5 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Illuminated ones don't want peace, they want constant turmoil, tragedy ,conflict, war, and defiance..While we are all preoccupied and dying, the Illuminati are getting richer than you can imagine and planning there next move, which they convey to themselves world wide by their paganistic use of and by using the inherent power of numbers!
2006-07-09 06:00:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
becoz the 6 developed nations on the security council will not allow it
2006-07-09 05:41:58 · answer #7 · answered by knu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because that would not be in the interests of the US
2006-07-09 05:18:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Two words:
JOHN BOLTON!
2006-07-09 05:15:53 · answer #9 · answered by GrandPoobaah 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋