if theres gonna be a war again between all countries in the world..who do you think will win??

Question

huh?

Answer 1

No one. We would ALL lose.

Answer 2

I think you wouldn't have any winners just survivors. I think that actually a large scale war might actually help things. As callous as that sounds please hear me out. Reason one: Such a war would result in those nations which have nuclear weapons using them. The resulting blast would probably take out major cities like Chicago, New York, London ect. but would spare smaller towns and rural/suburban areas. This would be a good thing because most of the high tech companies would be knocked out along with most electrical factories which would knock things back to the Stone Ages basiclly. This time you would have groups of people that for the most part just want to survive and already know each other and we might just get things right this time. I think if enough communication lines were saved to allow worldwide communication still then maybe someone like Thict Nhat Han could take over and get the different parties to sit down and talk with each other.

Answer 3

The answer is of course -- No one wins. Knowing this one must also realize that in the act, a war is won, as Gen. Patton is said to have said, "...by making the other fellow die for his country."

At the end of WWII little boys, Hitlers' Youth Corps, were left alone to fight in the streets of Germany. Today we have the youth of the world, being set up by virtual reality games, to think nothing of the death they will be called to die.

There will be no winner to call in a third world war. Looking at all critical factors ( military, political, economic & others) it is very clear that the result of a third world war will be the loss of all standing armies in the field. This would include troops produced off the grounds of Korea, Japan, China and Russia.

WWIII, Yes. Result, no standing armies left to supply and no chains of supply left to feed standing armies. Dark ages.
Best places to cope: South of the Tropic of Capricorn and North of the Artic Circle. Time line, 6 to 18 years.

Answer 4

NOT India . . . they don't have the arsenal, and aren't rich enough -- oh, wait. Bill Gates and the other dumb as@s are giving millions to them . . . nevermind.

(Oh, like India is REALLY going to do anything beneficial for its people!?!? COME ON -- WAKE UP -- they have a CASTE SYSTEM for crying out loud.)

Anyway, China might be able to because they have a lot of people. And they're trying really, REALLY hard to get out military secrets.

Don't you think it's interesting that they can guard the 11 herbs and spices of the KFC recipe, and Coca Cola still has it's recipe hidden from Pepsi . . . but the U.S. Military . . . open for business!

Oh, I digress ... Hmmmm, if we had WWIII -- that's World War THREE boys and girls -- it wouldn't be one country against the other. It would be A LOT of allies against one country, or it will be a lot of allies against a lot of enemies and their allies.

The world is too disenfranchised for China alone to do anything by themselves, for example. If they started some s'hit they'd have a lot of other nations stepping up to the plate to kick their Red Commie arses. And then they would have a lot of civilian uprising -- they treat their people like SHI T over there, by the way.

Russia's not a big threat anymore . . .

Answer 5

There is never a "winner" in war, there are repercussions and consequences for all involved. Even an unborn child will eventually feel the effects of a war they were never part of. Everyone has a relative they "never met" because of some past conflict.

Answer 6

If winning you mean, who will be left, I think the United states or Russia
Russia has 40,000 tons of chemical weapons in said to have around 16,000 nuclear weapons

The United states has 9,960 intact warheads and precision delivery systems. Along with biological and chemical weapons (for deactivation but not yet completed)

Answer 7

No one wins in a war

Answer 8

no one will win because
1. they would get tried of the war
2.no one would win because at the end everyone would have died
3.not enough matrails to make weapons
4.air would be polluted
5.not enough food would be made
6.everywhere would become an battleground
7.everyone would be against everyone
8.diease would spread fast
9.chaos would be loose
10.everyone would when they launch nuclear missle the countries have is more then enough to blow up the world

those reason no one would win

Answer 9

it will be the start of ww3 because no different u . s . a . may enable iran to win. india is between the few reliable international places in that section. wish it continues to be that way. and no means international places may enable iran to take administration of it. tell the iranian woman she is finished of shllllll and attempting to spread issues the position there are none. Isreal may love an excuse to nuke the vast mouth Iran.

Answer 10

I have to agree with most of the other answers on this. We would all loose. The only ones would would benefit would be the weapons dealers who sell the machines of death. There victory would only be short lived however since many of them would also be casualties.

Answer 11

pppttthhh, NO ONE "wins" in a war. Everybody loses.