his family should be paying the entire cost of your medical treatment for the baby and yourself before its born, and the baby after its born. Plus half of the bills incurred for living, clothing, food and shelter for the child. not you. you can sue him for this, if you can prove he did what you said he did, however it will be very hard to prove, you should tell him girls die every day in this world having babies of sick thugs like he is. and its not really a good plan to pass genes on from a guy like him.
2006-07-08 17:23:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
properly except you do not position self belief in womens liberation then only fools and beggers may answer an basic sure. Fisrt off i ought to desire you're speaking about a Husband. i'm so no longer the non secular style yet I actual have considered youthful toddlers starting to be up with a mom and pa and with 2 mom's or 2 Dad's or being a Bastard baby and not using a DAD. The married blend makes existence for a baby a lot less complicated and they have an inclination to do better. Now decrease back on your question. I imagine the mother to be works or has worked. if so she has earnings of her personal, if no longer then sure the husband ought to furnish finicial help. If 2 human beings have a baby out of wed lock and wothout making plans then for sure they're particularly irresponcible and in spite of the indisputable fact that the daddy of the youngster ought to make positive the mother to be is treated I doubt that sticks out because the case. If the mother to be and father to be are not from now on married then there is no longer some thing binding them to at least one yet another legally. i'd make positive a paternity try is done. If a so called father isn't providing help and under no circumstances purely money "it truly is so Ghetto" then his reason should be that the youngster may no longer be his. If there is no believe, morals, ethics and comprehend contained in the relationship then what distinction does it make your better off giving the toddler up for adoption because if the relationship is lacking of the above the youngster is only destine to be a screw-up.
2016-11-30 21:56:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He sounds like a real loser. I'm not sure what your legal recourses might be but I would guess he has to help pay for your medical expenses and any other expenses you will incur preparing for the baby. You can call your local legal aid office( listed under goverment listings I think probably by state) They will give you free advise and also help you retain an attorney for child support etc. Legal aid used to be free or based on your income. I would check into this if I were you. If this jerk has to have a legacy then make him take half the responsibility. Your a good person for keeping your baby. So many woman choose other ways and live to regret it. Good Luck and God Bless you and your baby.
2006-07-08 17:32:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by chitchenitza 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. He should pay for medical bills for visits to an OB-GYN for prenatal checkups. Because mom should be seeing a doctor on a very regular basis before she gives birth.
He should pay half her medical bills from the hospital stay related to her childbirth.
He should then voluntarily pay child support every month for the next eighteen years.
If he won't voluntarily do it, he should be compelled to do so by a court of law.
Just because you're separated doesn't mean he has no responsibility for this child. He shouldn't have to be forced to pay, but she should not financially suffer for this child. She should not ever resent her child. She should be able to love and care for the baby and not regret having brought him or her into the world. Daddy wants to leave a legacy (what a selfish, self-centered, asinine thing to do)? Then he should accept responsibility for his legacy.
Be a man. Be a dad. Don't be a deadbeat.
2006-07-08 17:28:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by agentdenim 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No!!!! the baby is his responsibility, not you. If you need things before you have the baby, ask him to buy them. It's not his place to support you!!! Everyone on here can think I'm a bit** if they want. With the way society is today, he doesn't even know the child is his. He is not responsible until paternity is established. Try to get money out of him before the baby is born. It won't happen. He also isn't responsible for your medical bills, only the baby's. Most likely since your single, you're on medicaid. That means no medical for you whatsoever. As far as needing things for the baby, have family and friends pay for them because it's not his responsibility until paternity is established on the child.
Are you married but sepperated or dating but sepperated?
2006-07-08 17:24:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Honey, this is a rough lesson for you to learn. Please respect yourself and stop sleeping with dogs. As far as the baby goes, you bet he owes you and I would take his rotten butt to court and get some real money too. You let the attorney know what was done, that is deception and much more. Considering he could've given you an STD too, I'd get the best of medical care for you and your baby very soon. Then, you may want to put the baby up for adoption to a good home.
2006-07-08 17:24:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by MadforMAC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You should always, always use a condom, but another form of birth control along with it would have saved you from HIS decision. He should be paying through the nose for this stunt. AND he should be GLAD to pay to keep his baby's mama happy. Sounds like he wants to HAVE his legacy, but he doesn't want to actually be responsible, care for or maybe even be a part of his legacy. Expect to be on your own before, during and after continuing his legacy. Best blessings to you and the baby. As for him, what goes around, comes around...and I hope it smacks him right in the face when it does.
2006-07-08 17:31:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by butrcupps 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
well in a way if he done that to u then let him suffer haha but in other way even know u know he did it i dont think so because it would be a wast because the baby isnt born yet and the money would not be going on baby because it ant there yet unless u r going ahead and buying stuff for it but y would u be buying stuff for the baby befor it is born u dont know if it my die at brith it happen every day so but after the baby is born then yea it would make sence if u made him pay u money
2006-07-08 17:25:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It doesn’t matter how or why he is the father…what matters is that he is the father and he is responsible for 50% of all cost that come from being a father. So yes he should pay, pay for co-pays to dr office, pay for hospital stay, pay for clothes, food if you are not breast-feeding. He needs to pay for everything that you will yourself have to pay. To bad he acted this way sounds really to young to be a father, but I do wish you the very best of luck!!!!
2006-07-08 17:24:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by AussieMom 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely. That child costs money long before it gets here. She has to buy clothes, baby furniture, diapers, etc... He needs to get his head out & see the light. A baby is a huge responsiblitiy that he intentionally brought into this world.
2006-07-08 17:24:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by pritigrl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋