Was I the only person who was a little disappointed with Superman Returns?

Question

I thought that it was kind of silly, overdone and WAY too long.
I was looking foward to seeing Kate Bosworth, but she wasn't good at all as the part of Lois Lane. She's pretty hot, though.
It seemed as though the movie was never going to end, and it got extremely drawn out by the end.
I also wasn't a huge fan of Superman, himself. First of all, his Superman hair drove me crazy. Second of all, he seemed very awkward and quiet. That bothered me, too.
I also did not like Perry White. I thought that he was the editor of the Inquisitor, not the Daily Planet. I don't know, but he didn't seem right for the part, either.
The worst part, however, was the lack of... change, by the end of the film. Nothing happened at all, Clark and Lois didn't even end up together. What was the point of this movie?
The ending screams for a sequel, but I don't know if I'll bother to see it. Overall, the special effects were the only aspect of the movie that made it remotley... special, you know?

Answer 1

I really liked it. I have seen it twice, and I will probably see it a 3rd time.

Brandon Routh played a great Superman and reminded me a lot of Christopher Reeves

Kevin Spacey played a better Lex Luthor than Gene Hackman.

Kate Bosworth was not a very good Lois Lane I thought Margot Kidder played her better.

all in all I thought the movie was very good. I thought Kevin played Lex much more ruthless like he is in the comic books.

Answer 2

1 HUGE PLOT HOLES
2 BAD SCRIPT
3 TERRIBLE SCREENPLAY
4 BAD ACTING
5 SEVERAL MISCASTS (INCLUDING BOSWORTH)
6 LENGTH
7 REHASH OF THE ORIGINAL FILM
8 NO ORIGINALITY
9 LACK OF ACTION
10 CHICK FLICK
11 SPECIAL EFFECTS NOT SO SPECIAL
12 THIS IS NOT SUPERMAN
13 RELIGIOUS AND HOMOSEXUAL UNDERTONES
14 BAD DIALOGUE
15 SINGER AND CO RUINED THE FILM