although I do not agree with the termanology of pro when referring to a womans right to choose, I agree with her, do you?
do you think that George W. Bush would be in the White House without Laura Welch-Bush?
who thinks she shoved the pretzel down George's throat?
2006-07-08 14:55:18 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
In a manner of speaking Bush is pro child slaughter as well. You see his falsely premised war has result in the destruction of basic services in Iraq (i.e. hospitals, food service, and sanitation) and the inflammation of sectarian violence, all of which are leading to the death of countless of children. So much for being pro-life. He is about as much pro-life as he is articulate.
2006-07-08 15:02:28 · answer #1 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I do and I know she is pro abortion but I also heard that Bush had a girl have an abortion when he was younger. I don't even know why he is in the White House but I could damn well tell you how he got in there. Yea, she looks like the type that would shove the pretzel but she probably missed cause I think she was aiming for his a$$. ( Wait she didn't miss ) !!!!!
2006-07-08 15:27:11 · answer #2 · answered by ₦âħí»€G 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I'm for women's rights but when it comes to abortion, I think the only real time it should be done is if it is a real medical emergency, or someone like a young child has been raped and wouldn't be able to handle the psychological and emotional sides of carrying a child. Anyone else should be old enough to know to use birth control and if they didn't then at least have the courage to let the baby live and give it up for adoption to good parents.
2006-07-08 14:59:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both President Bush and Laura agree that abortions should be acceptable in some instances. They both also want the number of abortions to decline.
So I guess according to that, you could also claim Bush is pro-abortion.
2006-07-08 15:13:03 · answer #4 · answered by kathy059 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do remember that before the first inauguration, she was on a talk show and said she was pro choice; then, he was on a show and when asked about it, said that what she thinks is irrelevant, he was the one elected president. And after that I had no more respect left for the man, and she was not let out on her own for more than a year.
2006-07-08 15:36:12 · answer #5 · answered by ash 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
someone ought to fairly locate abortion to be ugly or maybe frightening, yet once you weigh that antagonistic to the more suitable strong abortion does for society as an complete, and also the significance of the right of woman to make her personal judgements about her body and destiny, then that is ordinary to be sure why many human beings surely finish that even as abortion isn't in my opinion for them, it ought to nevertheless stay an determination for different women. i'm efficient there are some professional-determination human beings accessible that are conflicted in this way, purely as there must be professional-existence those who also sense conflicted. yet i ought to say that maximum individuals of professional-Choicers, such as myself, sense that a fetus or embryo isn't alive till after a particular aspect (oftentimes after 24 weeks) and for this reason do no longer locate maximum abortion to be immoral or incorrect.
2016-11-06 01:56:17 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a lot about the Bush fam that is on the left-of-center side of things.
2006-07-08 15:09:14 · answer #7 · answered by Evil Id. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And your point is? The Constitution guarantees us the right to free speech, including you.
2006-07-08 14:58:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good for her, a conservative that stands up for the right things
2006-07-08 15:00:07 · answer #9 · answered by thomas p 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its not pro-abortion its PRO-CHOICE (a womans right to chose). big difference. totally different definitions.
2006-07-08 14:59:55 · answer #10 · answered by flo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋