President Bush a Nazi?

Question

He invades Iraq for no reasonable reason; now Iran & North Korea have or are developing nuclear weapons and we can't do anything about it.

Answer 1

By comparing ANYTHING currently happening in the USA to the atrocities of Nazi Germany is to undermine the Hell of the concentrations camps, gas chambers and mass graves!

Even if Abu Ghraib was part of Bush's plan, the cruelty there paled in comparison to Auschwitz!

Stick to facts. By making such ridiculous comparisons, you lose an opportunity to share REAL, VALID complaints against Bush.

Answer 2

i agree with you that bush is like a nazi. like hitler, nazi. i would say the us president is a nazi because he's hurting a lot of muslims in iraq. muslims today are the new jews of world war II. bush has labeled ALL muslims as terrorists which is an excuse to get oil in iraq. but of course, he will never admit to that. due to this, he's attacking a lot of innocent iraqi muslims in their country. and many of them die as a result of americans stealing oil. that's how far i can say that bush is like a nazi. however, about the nuclear weapons... i just think that bush is a big bully. they pressure iran not to make nuclear weapons. what right do they have to mess around with other people's politics? it's not like iran is going to bomb another country. iran's reason of creating nuclear is to generate (electrical) power in their country. i believe bush is bullying them because they are nothing more than muslims or terrorists in his eyes. also, north korea has a right to create nuclear weapons. they created nuclear weaponry just to show that they do have power and not just the us only. america or bush, should i say, is just scared that their nation will get hit since north korea's calculations for the long-distance missile would reach the states. well, there goes my opinion!

Answer 3

Bush has always called the North Korean nukes and missiles "a regional issue" and said it's up to the neighbors of North Korea to do something about it. Now North Korea's tested the missiles and they can reach the western US. Perhaps that's still a regional issue as long as they can't reach Washington D.C. or Texas, as far as George is concerned.

We're still in Iraq and we may be heading into Iran soon. Iran is just now trying to develop a nuclear program and make some low-grade fissionable material. It has no noteworthy missile program. It's years away from being able to threaten us.

North Korea has Nuclear Bombs and missiles that can hit us right now, at this very second. They're threatening a counter-attack if any nation tries to stop it from testing any more missiles, and George may or may not do something about that. Probably not. He'd rather go into Iran. He sees them as more of an imminent threat. Perhaps it's because North Korea has no oil. Perhaps its because North Korea has so few Muslims.

I'd rather comment on the Nazi point. Hitler ranted and raved and pounded the podium. George Bush did that a lot in his first six months. Hitler was a phony religious fundamentalist who pretended he was acting in his country's best interest by killing members of a world religion he despised. Hitler invaded Poland under false pretexts and took on a big part of the rest of the world one country at a time. Hitler bypassed his country's versions of its constitution and congress and senate whenever it suited him and no one ever challenged him in a meaningful fashion. Hitler's entire nation was lied to and told nothing about his hidden agenda. He disguised it as patriotism and strong nationality and national defense. At Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, we photographed our prison guards siccing trained attack dogs on men. We tortured them and made them perform unnatural sex acts upon each other in front of the cameras. We tortured them by drownings, near electrocutions to the privates, and the cutting, burning, and smashing of body parts. Many of these people were taken in only because they shared a common family name or an informer had turned them in, sometimes in order to escape their own torture. Our media mostly turned a blind eye and so did we. Just like the German people and media did after its concentration camps were no longer just dirty little secrets.

All but two countries finally turned on Germany and it was defeated. At the end of WWII, a shameful Germany had to stand under the watchful eyes of the entire world as it attempted to blame everything on Hitler. Germany was never again a world power. Like the Greeks, the Romans, the Mayas, and the Incas, it was brought down by the excesses of its leaders. It was never again judged for all it had done right, but by all it had done wrong. There is a lesson to be learned there somewhere.

Answer 4

no but I think you are - I may not agree with all his decisions but I support him because he is the President of the United States. To oppose him during a time of war does not help the country it helps the enemy and gets American soldiers killed.

He invaded for no reason are you stupid or what - just a MORON right. both Iran and N Korea will sell Nuclear Bombs and the science to build them to any one with a check book. What do you think will happen to your tiny little rock you live under if a terrorist get a nuke. Your are such a @ss whole

Answer 5

So what are you a Liberal thats a cry baby that wouldn't grab a rifle and stand the post. Most of you say we invaded for no reason. Next time your going down the street really take a good look at that Arab is he gonna fly a jet into your house they are the problem not the Prez of the USA.

Answer 6

Godwin's Law /prov./ [Usenet] "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups.

The NAZI Party was the National SOCIALIST Party. The Nazis were LIBERALS, you moron.

Answer 7

This question has been asked 50 zillion times. Can't you be original? Toppling Saddam Hussein wasn't a good thing?
We had better do something about more lunatics having nuclear weapons. They tend to use them. Hiroshima. Nagasaki. Ring a bell?

Answer 8

Of course not...he is just his father's son, pushed to be Prez. without any credentials. If we can just make it till the next election, maybe a lot of people will wake up and vote for someone with intelligence and knowledge of government. I do not like him, but I wish him no harm....he just has not shown the capabilities needed to run this country.

Answer 9

That guy proves his lack of expertise further and extra prevalent. If I were him; i'd in simple terms close my mouth and walk out of the white domicile silently. i'm positive he will finally get too comfortable and not in any respect have as many secret amenities round him. i'm positive someone someplace is perhaps waiting to safeguard him.

Answer 10

No reasonable reason?
How about a dictator that gassed tens of thousands of people to death using chemical weapons?
We have already what happens when you appease such people (see Hitler).