1.In Peace,[If he hit me,if I hit him,and so on,we are lost.If I leave for my work I win,and we win every times.]Without Wars!2.Just use full works:learning,writing,jobs,like every one see another.3.Without:football,tennis,fighting,and other games.A lot of time lost by players,by policy,by many others as looking for games,many things destroyed,and so on.From this the poverty.So long some people works and the players receive the money,will be so.When the world will be so smart we will survive
2006-07-08 09:56:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Leonard B 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I believe that Stephen Hawking has recently asked this question.
Alas, I haven't seen any of the answers he collected or anything other
than a brief summary of his own feelings.
I believe he said that space travel was a requirement - and I agree with him.
Fundamentally, the issue is that the advances in technology have made
it possible for progressively smaller and smaller elements of the population
to destroy the rest of the population. We're now at a point where
an individual could, comparatively easily, destroy the world.
The longer we go, the more individuals we have and the easier it gets
for one of them to cause disaster.
By the way, I am not just referring to planned disasters, I am also referring
to people traveling from one part of the planet to another carrying
diseases, someone creating a computer virus that inadvertently
does what Y2K couldn't etc.
If technology makes the world smaller, we need to do something to
increase its size again - that is, make it more difficult for one element
to effect every other element.
This means we either get rid of lots of technology (which is hard
to do ... how does society "unlearn" something?) or we get off the
planet.
Consider how difficult it would be for a mistake committed on a colony
on Mars to cause disaster on the Moon? How difficult would it be for
a mistake in this solar system to effect another?
Stopping general population growth will help, but does not solve the
problem.
Decreasing poverty will help, but does not solve the problem. Indeed,
if people have money, they tend to get educated. Educated people
have a wider effect on the world than non-educated people, so decreasing
poverty without changing anything else may make things worse.
As long as we have rogue elements, the problem is great. I don't see
how we can handle environmental changes without variation, so we will
always have rogue elements.
We're doomed without the ability to get off this rock.
2006-07-08 15:41:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Elana 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The same way it has existed all along. The young people on here are always afraid of the world ending soon because of events that have happened. There have been "events" happening for centruies and people have believed from the beginning of time that "this is when the world is going to end" so please stop with the fears. One, if it does end, it's not going to matter later. You can't live your life in fear because that is a shameful waste of life and I am positive your higher power - whoever or whatever that may be - does not WANT you to live your life in fear like that. Enjoy the time you are alive without fearing death. You must or you will live a miserable life.
2006-07-08 15:34:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The human race will survive no matter what happens.It has proven itself capable of surviving for two world wars.Obviously it will survive the next century.There may be some deteriorations and improvements but the human race will surely survive.
2006-07-08 15:32:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Eternity 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The human race needs to get some original questions.
2006-07-08 15:32:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by makibear 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
for all i know not everything lasts forever. the human race will eventually die out and new species will roam the earth, due to climate change, asteroid impact, or other causes. mass extinctions have occured throughout the years and another one will happen soon enough.
2006-07-08 16:00:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by xiy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
By continuing to reproduce offspring whether it be for passion or for maintaining humans as a species.. doesn't much matter either way.
2006-07-08 15:32:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by brianseviltwin1425 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe you should refer to the original version of this question by Dr Stephen Hawking which was asked previously.
There you might find the answer to your clone of his question.
2006-07-08 15:33:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by J 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really don't think it will
man will kill man before then well that's what i belive this world is evil humans are becoming worthless greedy and power mad
respect
shaz
2006-07-08 15:32:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by sharon B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have Everyone Hold Their Breath
2006-07-08 15:32:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by dogsx11 2
·
0⤊
0⤋