George Bush has been our President for 2 terms. Overwhelming evidence has now surfaced proving vote fraud. He did not win either election. Why then, is he our President, and how are we supposed to believe that our vote counts?
If you're sitting there doing nothing about the freedoms that this administration is taking away from you because you think it will all be ok when he's no longer President ~ think about that.
Since George is obviously not smart enough to have pulled this off on his own ~ who do you think is behind it, and will they still be calling the shots in 2008?
2006-07-08 06:31:46 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
In voting it's NOT your vote that counts it's the one that counts the votes!
http://www.total-knowledge.com/~willyblues/
2006-07-08 06:34:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Obviously, somone's vote counts. The problem is less corruption and more systemic. The electoral college has got to go the way of the dinosaur. The number of electors from each state is derived from the 2 senators and a certain amount of congressmen that state sends to the capital. We don't expect republicans and democrats from the same state to vote the same on laws by virtue of being from the same state, do we?
Then why do we accept this stupid notion that states must give all it's electoral votes to a single candidate instead of dividing it by district as would just make simple sense.
Also, public campaign financing and instant run off voting would help matters greatly. Check them out
2006-07-08 14:14:14 · answer #2 · answered by sennorikyu72 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Funny you mention Vote Fraud, which seems to happen in mostly Democratic jurisdictions coincidence? Florida voting problems happened when the election board was run by a Democrat. In Washington State Felons voted and there were curious problems in Liberal King County and there is a Democrat in power now as Governor. Coincidence?
Indiana Democrats fought to prevent ID being used to vote.
The Law was upheld and the Dead in Democrat run Madison County did not vote in the last election.
The Electoral College is still constitutional and your vote does count, it just not based on the popular vote because states can still leave the Union.
2006-07-08 14:49:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No your vote is a ruse it doesn't count for anything.
As for who is running the Gov. it's the Irish. Think about it. the Irish represent a 14% minority in America yet hold 75% of all political offices.
Go down the list We haven't had a non Irish president since Nixon and you see how that worked out.
And not just the Whitehouse everything from the local cops on up Irish people run the Government.
2006-07-08 13:39:23 · answer #4 · answered by Rocketman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it is counted.
http://www.votergate.tv
James Baker III allegedly orchestrated the amazing events in FL. using Enron corporate jets to fly out of state Republican operators to cities in FL to demonstrate and foment confusion. K. Harris moved heaven and earth to thwart vote recounts. The Supreme Ct. went completely out of it's jurisdiction
to appoint W by a 5-4 margin.
In 2004 voting "irregularities" in Ohio caused another election anomaly, and Kerry and Edwards rushed to concede.
Does not lead me to complete confidence.
See: Karl Rove
2006-07-08 13:42:39 · answer #5 · answered by helixburger 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He won the popular vote in 2004, and was the first president to do so since 1976.
Our vote counts, but is diluted.
It would count more if we had better choices.
2006-07-08 13:34:47 · answer #6 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Voter fraud occurs on both sides of the spectrum. All this question does is prove that the President is in fact, smarter than you. America is not a fraud or a dictatorship.
2006-07-08 13:34:33 · answer #7 · answered by madcaddees 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Overwhelming evidence of 'conservative' voter fraud? Please cite your sources. The bi-partisan congressionally established committee which reviewed all the accusations of fraud established just the opposite - overwhelming established the opposite (where democratically held precincts had more instances of fraud than anywhere else).
Because your premise is invalidated by authoritative sources (a bi-partisan congressional committee) and therefor non-sequitur to your hypothesis, an answer to your hypothesis is uncalled for.
Better luck next time!
2006-07-08 13:42:39 · answer #8 · answered by wyrdnews 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
His dad had all kinds of connection with the CIA! And other intelligence agencies, I'm sure they have the coordinator resources to throw an election especially when the general populace is overworked overly busy and apathetic.
2006-07-08 13:37:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I could go into numerous details but if your really interested in hearing the argument that recent elections have had massive elements of fraud then RFK jr does a much better job than I ever could.
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen
2006-07-08 13:50:59 · answer #10 · answered by Jared H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋