English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-08 06:23:05 · 13 answers · asked by laura_bush_is_fetching 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

13 answers

No, they are entirely unrelated positions. That's why most people involved on the pro-life side of the debate don't understand.

Look at it this way. Pro-life people say "abortion is bad". Pro-abortion people say "abortion is good". Pro-choice advocates say "The government should be making personal decisions that like". It's not about abortion. It's about who gets to make the decisions.


Have you ever heard someone come flat out and say "abortion is good, and everyone should have an abortion"? I doubt it. But that's what a pro-abortion promoter would say. What the pro-choice advocate says is: the government should not have the authority to take away and mandate personal choices. Can you see the difference?

The question boils down to this -- in the end, someone is going to choose. It's either going to be the individual, or it's going to be the majority (through enacted laws). If the majority gets to choose, then they are effectively imposing their belief system -- which is almost always religiously-based -- on everyone.

Do you really want to abdicate that much of your personal freedom and choice to a group of politicians? Do people really want to live in a country where state legislatures can decide who can be pregnant, and who cannot, and who must? Do people really have that much trust and faith in government that they think the legislature will always make the right choices? Because we'll be stuck with those decisions.

The concept of reproductive freedoms is not whether you agree with the individual choices being made. It's about who gets to make those choices -- the individual or the mob-majority.

Why can't people understand that freedom of choice is not a minority value, even if the majority happens to disagree with the minority's choice?

2006-07-08 09:24:16 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4 2

To really answer that, we'd have to have an agreed upon definition of "pro-abortion", and I dont think the term is commonly used or has a generally accepted definition.

Logically, if a "pro-life" position means a person believes all pregnancies should carried to term, and a "pro-choice" person believes the woman should have a choice, then a "pro-abortion" position would mean that a person believes ALL pregancies should end in abortion. That would put the pro-life and pro-abortion people on the extreme ends of the issue, with the pro-choice position serving as a compromise between the two.

2006-07-08 06:32:32 · answer #2 · answered by Phil S 5 · 0 0

No, not necessarily. Pro Choice would mean you believe a person has the choice to do with their life what they feel is best. In today's terms it is usually associated with abortion. That being said you can be pro-choice and not pro-abortion. That would be where you believe that another woman could do with her life what she wants, but you don't necessarily agree that abortion is the absolute right thing to do, but that you won't enforce your personal beliefs on her, and you will let her decide for herself what is right. The problem that everyone gets in to on this subject is that everyone believes you can do with your body what ever you want to, so long as you don't impact or hurt another person. pro-life people believe that a child has life upon conception (no matter how far in to the pregnancy you are), so when a pregnant mother decides to have an abortion because it is her right to do that to her body, she is not taking in to consideration that life inside of her will be negatively impacted by that choice. Really the word pro-choice is a spin to make the idea more palatable for the rest of the world, really the terms which should be used is pro-abortion, or against abortion, not pro-choice or pro-life.

2006-07-08 06:33:33 · answer #3 · answered by asmul8ed 5 · 0 0

Not exactly. A person who is pro-choice might not necessarily choose abortion as his or her choice but doesn't want that right to be taken away from others. We each have our particular beliefs, whether religious or not, and have been brought up and socialized to believe certain things. Everything isn't perfect and black and white in the real world. Not every child can be healthy, adoptable or placed in a good family when it's not wanted. Also, one thing I never could understand. Why, if the child is "innocent" and is a living, breathing being at conception, why is it okay to murder it if the mother has been raped or it's a product of incest? The child hasn't done anything wrong, so an innocent being is killed. I wish those against abortion would stick with their ideals. NO child, no matter how it was conceived, should have its life ended if one truly believes it's alive. At least be consistent in your argument.

2006-07-08 06:35:24 · answer #4 · answered by HamTownGal 3 · 0 0

Yes, pro-choice is the belief that every woman has the right to choose if they want to have an abortion or not. So if you believe that women should be able to have abortions if they choose too then you would be pro-choice.

2006-07-08 06:28:03 · answer #5 · answered by chinababydoll1975 1 · 0 0

No, Pro-Choice means that you feel that the woman has the right to choose whether or not to have an abortion. It has nothing to do with your own personal preferences. What may be right/wrong for you may not be for someone else.
Pro-Abortions means that you support abortions.

2006-07-08 06:29:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There is no such thing as "pro-abortion." It is a myth perpetuated by radical pro-lifers. At the end of the day, everyone agrees that abortion is not a good solution. Some just believe that, at times, it is the only one.

2006-07-08 06:39:04 · answer #7 · answered by douglas h 1 · 0 0

NO it is not!! I don't think abortion is right in most cases, therefore I'm not pro-abortion, but I do think that everybody has the right to make that choice for themselves. It's people who don't know the difference who make us out to be "baby killers."

2006-07-08 06:27:31 · answer #8 · answered by jellybean24 5 · 0 0

Yes, if there is any **choice** in a decision where the unborn baby will be killed during a medical procedure, Pro-Choice=Pro Abortion. IF the unborn baby HAS NO CHOICE IT IS ABORTION!

2006-07-08 06:38:47 · answer #9 · answered by Russian Tomcat's catnip 1 · 0 0

in case you rather get all the way down to it, professional-abortion and professional-decision are one and an identical. the difficulty is abortion. you're able to be for or against. That leaves you with 2 plausible positions: professional-abortion, or anti-abortion. The words "professional-existence" and "professional-decision" have been coined by ability of the events to make their stances seem greater favorable. they are merely euphemisms, and that they are rather fairly deceptive. That aside, this is demanding to assert what your stance is. Many Republicans even have confidence that abortion is tolerable in circumstances of rape or if the wellbeing of the mummy is in jeopardy. whilst the two stances are professional-abortion and anti-abortion, there do exist various tiers of each. EDIT: i became analyzing over a number of the different solutions and experience it mandatory to make a extreme distinction. professional-abortion does not mean you opt to abort each being pregnant. It merely ability which you help the splendid of a woman to have an abortion. in case you do not help this actual (or, often times, help it in user-friendly terms interior the form of rape or wellbeing concerns), you're anti-abortion. It merely does not sound as sugarcoated as "professional decision." in case you are able to not see this distinction, please take a 2d to think of approximately it. you're identifying to purchase into the euphanisms.

2016-12-08 17:14:52 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers