English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-08 06:20:30 · 17 answers · asked by werewolfpixie 5 in Politics & Government Government

i'm sorry scott if the answer is getting boring. i haven't come across one and i wanted peoples opinion.

2006-07-08 16:44:05 · update #1

oops question...sorry

2006-07-08 16:46:14 · update #2

17 answers

Yes, I voted for Bush and no, I don't regret my vote as Gore or Kerry would not hae been better in my opinion (especially Kerry.) I don't think he's doing a "wonderful" job however I do believe he's trying to do the right thing for our country. I don't agree with all of his policies but again, I think he's trying.

Keep in mind, there has never been a president with a higher "approval rating" then GW (92%) after 9-11 and Reagan's highest rating topped out at 68%, Clinton was 73%.

What I'm trying to say is that not everyone approves of their presidents decisions and actions therefore to ask if he's doing a "wondeful job" is like asking if you like onions. Some people do, some people don't.

That's what makes this country so great.

2006-07-08 06:29:06 · answer #1 · answered by Shep 5 · 2 2

We've seen this question before. It's getting boring. Frankly, all the Bush-bashing is getting boring.

Same answer as last time. I only voted for him once. I start to regret it, and then I think back to who the alternative was (Al Gore), and I realize that my choice doesn't look so bad after all. Yeah, Bush has been a great disappointment as president, but as long as the Democrats keep putting up extremists as the only alternative, we'll keep getting stuck with more of the same. Can't the Democrats put up a reasonable candidate for once?

2006-07-08 06:28:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He's doing a great job. He is a leader. After 8 years of Clinton/Gore waiting to see poll results before making a spineless decision, Bush is refreshing. He speaks plainly and you know what he means; rather than Clinton trying to define the word "is" or lying about not having sex with Monica or selling secret technology to the North Koreans and China.

Bush brought the economy back up after it fell apart from Clinton/Gore tax hikes. Even while fighting a war on terror and liars such as Dan Rather and the New York Times, the country continues to prosper. Imagine what we could do as a country, if the liberals got out of the way!

2006-07-08 06:33:19 · answer #3 · answered by DrTandem 2 · 0 0

regret it - NEVER !
he's doing a pretty good job considering the whiney liberal have been on his rear-end since he was elected...
Only FDR had to worry more about the US that Bush does now. No other Prez had such problems (terror attacks, etc).
Carter gave us a gas shortage, sky-hi gas prices, inflation worse than today (compare the standards) & let Iran take US hostages for almost a year & did nothing

2006-07-08 06:26:23 · answer #4 · answered by polka_123_pa 3 · 0 0

I am very impressed with the job our President is doing.
Yes I voted for him both times. This vote came after hours of study, He was by far superior to anyone who has run against him.

2006-07-08 06:24:19 · answer #5 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0 0

no... he has finished a good interest i imagine.. all issues considered... no longer to assert there is no longer room for progression... yet we were dealing with the completed tech bubble bust even as he first got here into workplace... then we experienced the worst attack on american soil ever.... he hasn't been each and everything i'd became hoping he may be... yet nevertheless particularly good so a procedures as presidents bypass

2016-11-30 21:10:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't regret it at all. If I even have a bit of second-guessing, all I have to do is remind myself that the alternative was Kerry, and we would be totally screwed if he was president.

2006-07-08 06:24:12 · answer #7 · answered by jh 6 · 0 0

I didnt vote for him and regret that others did..he is doing a hellacious job..there is no president in history that has done worse than he has. He has made his own spot in history..worse president ever!

2006-07-08 06:25:46 · answer #8 · answered by msstyic 2 · 0 0

Unfortunately, the alternative was Kerry.

I looked into his convictions as a presidential candidate, and frankly couldn't determine that there were any.

So I don't know if it would have been worse or better had I voted for him.

2006-07-08 06:24:06 · answer #9 · answered by DAR 7 · 0 0

he is not the president i would like but he's the best man we had run for the job. the idea of either kerry or gore in charge scares the bejabbers out of me. bring back RR

2006-07-08 06:26:07 · answer #10 · answered by glen t 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers