2006-07-08 05:57:47 · 22 answers · asked by Walt C 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
only if she's willing to start smoking a cigar and wear a blue dress...lol..
2006-07-08 05:59:37 · answer #1 · answered by Ms Fortune 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
decrease than ninety days till u.s. Votes. Even Sanjaya stayed alive longer than the polls pronounced. Obama/Edwards might have a shot. fact. sure, she has offered and paid for it already. even with the incontrovertible fact that, the warrants for arrest concerning unlawful marketing campaign donations will fly so rapid the day after the same old. much like her Husband grew to become into occupied on his watch as terrorist roamed freely pre 9/11 interior the u . s ., she would be waiting to additionally be too busy in court to pay interest as she is faraway from the final. it quite is the tone i'm analyzing. in my opinion, it's going to be approximately damn time. thank you. *2 costs (sorry no link) Bush: sure, Hillary will take the Dem nomination and could be defeated by employing the Republican challenger. Al Gore: i'm no longer working for President. i visit even with the incontrovertible fact that be prepared to fill Hillary's footwear might desire to she be faraway from the election. ask your self what they know already??
2016-12-10 06:30:19 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no I dont think so and this is an idea started by the republicans. I dont understand the hatred for Mrs. Clinton. She's a very strong lady in my opinon but, the usa is not ready for a female president its not time yet. as for rice after having been a part of the bush administration I would not vote for her to be dogcatcher.
2006-07-08 06:16:21 · answer #3 · answered by msstyic 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the Democrats want her. I am not sure if she is electable though. She has a reputation as a liberal, but she is not as liberal as people think. Her husband was a moderate at best and how different could she be from him? I think she would be a good president and wish her all the luck in the world.
2006-07-08 06:17:14 · answer #4 · answered by bumpocooper 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, she's a devious, lying, and immoral person. She is pretending to be somewhat in the conservative camp, but is a liberal. She even tells Bill what to do and how to do it. If she cannot have a relationship with her husband which is an equally shared union, then what makes us think she can deal with running our country, representing our country, and having objective decision making processes.
She is NOT the smartest woman in the world, just cunning and manipulating.
2006-07-08 06:03:43 · answer #5 · answered by dusty88240 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely, She has the credentials and the experience.It's about time we usher in a new age in polotics.I'm sure we wouldn't be playing 911 for the worlds problems , and focusing on our own shortcomings ,if Mrs. Clinton was our Commander in Chief.
2006-07-08 06:08:28 · answer #6 · answered by Peyton 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If she is I will move to Canada or Mexico. She would destroy our country. I think we should wait until the War on Terror is over before we elect a woman to run in an election, because most countries that we are at war with don't think that women are important and it could provoke another attack
2006-07-08 07:37:53 · answer #7 · answered by gigi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd vote for her in a heartbeat, but she could probably not win. She's been so vilified. At least she has a brain in her head. Plus, I don't think the US is ready for a female president yet, despite Geena Davis. Who is electable as a Dem??
2006-07-08 06:03:31 · answer #8 · answered by alison k 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Running the country would be a piece of cake for after what she put up with as Bill's wife!
2006-07-08 06:01:30 · answer #9 · answered by NannyMcPhee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, because she will not win. More people hate her than like her. If it does happen the Dems may as well concede at that moment.
2006-07-08 06:00:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋