English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Star Trek Enterprise was cancelled at the end of it's 4th season. Should Paramount bring back Enterprise and give it another 3 seasons before making a new Trek movie ?

2006-07-08 05:16:38 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Television

12 answers

I don't see why everyone hated that show so much. I love Enterprise. I wasn't interrested in Star Trek when the show was actually running (I was too young) but now I watch the episodes on DVD. I love them! I love the way they did the theme song, I think the characters are great, and I love the storylines for the episodes! I think the Trekkies who hated it are delusional.

2006-07-11 17:53:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Star Trek Enterprise should return it was by far one of the best Star Treks by far!!! It was more realistic than any of the first series of Star Trek, and Scott Baccula was better than Captain kirk. BRING IT BACK!!!!!!!!!

2015-02-17 06:56:10 · answer #2 · answered by Marcia 1 · 0 0

In my opinion, it should not have been created in the first place. Paramount pictures made a huge mistake by creating the show for one simple reason, they did not stay true to the Star Trek story line. When they started to encounter Star Trek species that hadn't actually been discovered for 200 years to come in the REAL Star Trek history, they made a lot of people angry. I watched about two episodes, I do believe. The story was just not the Trek that people had grown up with. I didn't grow up with Trek, but I still know the difference. If you're going to make a Pre-date series, you need to stay true to ALL of the later plots. I'm surprised it took Enterprise four years to be cancelled. It was a complete waste of money and air time.

2006-07-12 17:05:22 · answer #3 · answered by mickie4004 2 · 0 5

Well, first of all, I don't think it would ever happen in a million years. The sets have been destroyed and the cast and crew have moved on.

But you asked if it SHOULD be brought back, so we'll ignore reality for a minute. I honestly don't think that it should. I thought the prequel premise was a bad idea and over the first three years it was badly executed. I'll admit that Manny Coto brought some life back into the show in the fourth season but it wasn't enough to make up for the problems that were inherent in the show from the beginning.

It is worth noting, though, that Pocket Books plans to launch a series of "Star Trek: Enterprise" books in the next year or two that will detail what happened after the season finale, much like they've done with VOY, DS9, and TNG (post-"Nemesis).

2006-07-11 11:57:42 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 4

Enterprise was a great show. I was sorry to see it cancelled. I don't think Paramount has any plans to bring it back. I'm sure they would love a story that would jumpstart the Star Trek franchise

2006-07-08 05:21:21 · answer #5 · answered by Elder36 3 · 4 0

You need the proper mixture of gases. To much oxygen will cause oxygen poisoning and would be an accelerant in the event of a fire. Not enough you would suffer from oxygen deprivation and sufficate. You would also have to have moisture in the air so your nasal cavity and lungs dry out and cause respitory problems. Another issue there is the build up of carbon dioxide. Another issue most people don't think about is the 50,000 btu's (British Thermal Units) of heat that every human puts out. A/C units are engineered around how many people will be in a building at any one time. More people requires bigger HVAC systems. There is heat also coming off machines, lighting and other misc. sources.

2016-03-26 21:36:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd like to see at least another year of the show. I wonder what kind of tie-ins there will be with this show and others in the movie.

2006-07-08 07:00:53 · answer #7 · answered by dbelyew 2 · 3 0

No!!!!! Enterprise messed up accepted star trek history with a boring and unconvicing crew. In my mind, Enterprise never existed.

2006-07-12 09:06:33 · answer #8 · answered by spockofvullcan 3 · 0 5

NOWAY!! I hated that show it tottally had crappy characters compared to The Next Generation and Voyager. Scott Baccula is a bad actor and T'pal was the stupidest and worst Vulcan ever!

2006-07-12 04:25:08 · answer #9 · answered by Kelly + Eternal Universal Energy 7 · 0 3

No way that was the most boring star trek ever made thats why it only had 4 seasons I just asked a question about this star trek on the U.S answers and every one agreed. not enough action and it was to serious.

2006-07-08 09:27:32 · answer #10 · answered by sarah k 3 · 0 8

fedest.com, questions and answers