2006-07-08 04:30:09 · 8 answers · asked by allosh 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
it was just a story with so many characters that were related to each others story, but they didnt know it. I didnt think it was going to be picked best movie of the year, kinda a big letdown. It was about racism, and all that stuff
2006-07-08 04:33:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The first Crash with James Spader and Holly Hunter was a strange tale about people who survive car crashes and suddenly get off to having sex in cars and playing with each other's scars.
The more recent Crash was a montage of car related stories used to illustrate the differences and similarities in society and the interdependency of it's members.
So what was your question?
The first one was good.
The second one was a little too much like Magnolia and 11:14 which have better acting and editing.
2006-07-08 11:42:25 · answer #2 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont understand what you're saying. Crash is a good movie, yes, but what the heck are you trying to say?
2006-07-08 11:32:37 · answer #3 · answered by mrxxbrian 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know why it won the Oscar for Best Picture. It was just another film. It didn't stand out.
The only reason I saw it was because someone lent me her DVD. I'm glad I didn't pay to see it.
2006-07-08 12:17:23 · answer #4 · answered by sister_godzilla 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People stereotype, and there is racism in LA. That's what I got from the movie.
2006-07-08 11:44:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it says we're all interconnected and we can't get away from dealing with people we don't want. coz life is like that, we just crash into each other's lives.
2006-07-08 11:37:04 · answer #6 · answered by crage_ralius 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
stereotype situations
2006-07-08 11:35:17 · answer #7 · answered by uimblue 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I watched it, I hated it, it had no redeeming value...
2006-07-08 11:33:27 · answer #8 · answered by red9 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋