English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

Mass psychology...
with physiology you can help individuals to feel better.
with psychology applyied to masses, you can control mass behaviour and avoid destruction.

I believe human kind being more at risk of self-destruction in the next 100 years than at a biological risk.

2006-07-08 04:25:50 · answer #1 · answered by OneLilithHidesAnother 4 · 4 0

I believe that physiology is most important. Psychology will only reach those that are willing to listen. Dictators/governments, ideological extremists, and many others will not sit down and listen to mass psychology, and those are the groups most likely to bring the end of human survival. Advancements in physiology, on the other hand, will allow humans to survive world wide life threatening situations. It still remains a race between when the wrong people or governments use or receive doomsday technology and scientific research being able to counter any doomsday ideas.

2006-07-08 04:38:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Good question, but why the hell would you want mankind to survive for the next 100 years? The sooner we destroy ourselves, the better.

2006-07-08 05:03:48 · answer #3 · answered by Fred F 1 · 0 0

Neuroscience

2006-07-08 04:54:18 · answer #4 · answered by Nietzsche 1 · 0 0

Specialization in both brings them to a draw...

...except if a crisis were sudden, physiology wins.

2006-07-08 04:29:36 · answer #5 · answered by "Time" - the sage 2 · 0 0

Def. psychology

2006-07-08 04:23:07 · answer #6 · answered by Burple 4 · 0 0

Your question is vague and ridiculous. Everyone knows that the world will end in 2012 just as the Mayan's predicted. duh.

2006-07-08 04:28:42 · answer #7 · answered by tldrotar 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers