I not talking about best value ticket wise. I'm asking which London club do you think is best value for money considering how much there players are worth?
Personally I think it's Watford at the mo, closely followed by West Ham and Arsenal.
2006-07-08 03:39:57 · 10 answers · asked by Will S 2 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
Arsenal - it's in London, then West Ham, the most expensive is Chelsea.
2006-07-12 14:23:56 · answer #1 · answered by JAM123 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you meant value for money based on prices clubs paid for players then Aaron Lennon bought for £1m , Paul Robinson £1.5m , Carrick £3.75m ,Ledley King £0 through Youth System , represent very good value for money so Spurs are worth a mention. IMHO
2006-07-09 04:42:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Manchester United and Chelsea and Arsenal they have good players
2006-07-08 12:02:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah, it's gotta be Millwall!!!!! I'd love to watch Arsenal play live but the tickets are far too expensive but I would pay if I could afford it.
2006-07-08 03:45:38 · answer #4 · answered by LONDONER © 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
arsenal - don't spend as much as chelsea and man u and still put out a great squad every year. i would sell a kidney to go to an arsenal game.
2006-07-09 04:25:23 · answer #5 · answered by Barry_2050 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Watford is not in London, its just outside.
2006-07-09 00:02:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Queens Park Rangers
The finest London team the world has ever seen!!!!!!!!
2006-07-09 06:28:23 · answer #7 · answered by HOOPS 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
leicester city!! innit!!
2006-07-08 03:54:33 · answer #8 · answered by crazy maizy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
MAN U!!!!!!
2006-07-08 07:25:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
none there all crap
2006-07-10 07:58:16 · answer #10 · answered by irlamboyo1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋