Because the said action personalizes the meeting. It shows sincerity and being one with the person they are meeting. ;)
2006-07-08 03:27:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jo Ann 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Can't be sure but I have heard two origins for this.
1) it shows you do not have a weapon in your hand (gos back to the tims B.C.) and
2) a show of warmth -- to show reverence...when meeting a high ranking church official one would kiss his hand and kneel...shaking hands is a lesser form of recognition among laypeople -- obviously stronger when a man meets a man and much gentler when a man meets a woman.
Hope that helps
2006-07-08 10:28:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by summitdog2001 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
polite
although i don't like shaking hands
2006-07-08 10:32:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by bgrt 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the Middle Ages, they offered each other their hand in order to show they were not holding a weapon. It was a safety precaution.
2006-07-08 10:27:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by snaarf 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why would they hug when they could just shake hands...
Hmmm... a human touch beyond basic acknowledgment maybe.
2006-07-08 10:27:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Steve D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dates from way, way back. A person would extend the right hand to show that he (typically) did not have a weapon.
2006-07-08 10:26:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by warriorwoman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I gently touch hands, then let go, not shake.
2006-07-08 10:32:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by ♣ ♣ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Etiquette, Miss Manners, etc...
2006-07-08 11:15:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by charleedude 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
proper way to invade some else's personal space.
2006-07-08 10:26:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Stacy R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good question!! I guess it's better than kissing everytime!
2006-07-08 10:36:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by kr8zy k 3
·
0⤊
0⤋