Relativity states that time runs more slowly for an object in motion. Howevere, isn't it impossible to know if an object is in motion except by comparison to another object? If so, who's to say which object is moving? If the two objects are simply in motion relative to each other, then which would experience a slowing of time?
2006-07-08
02:26:14
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Physics
Seems that the consensus is that any observer will say that a clock moving relative to that observer is runnng slower than the observer's own clock. So if the clocks are accelerated such that they are still relative to each other, will they sync up? How does this relate to the story of twins where one goes on a speedy trip and returns less aged than the twin who stayed put? It seems to me that there is a difference, and that it's not just a case of each observer thinking the other clock is running slower. The crux of the issue seems to be that while we all agree that a clock in motion runs slower than one that is stationary, and we agree that movement is relative, still when the clocks are brought together one is behind the other. What's different if the movement is only relative to each other? It's go to have something to do with acceleration.
2006-07-09
02:57:26 ·
update #1