The pope in question was Hadrian IV.
2006-07-08 02:19:06 · 13 answers · asked by mouthbreather77 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Mohammed did marry a 9 year old, but never consumated the marriage until she was about 16. And her name was Aisha, for your information.
Besides, one cannot judge the way people lived 1400 years ago with a mindframe of today's laws and standards. Remember that centuries ago, people got married at very young ages because of the very short life expectancy. Today, we get to live up to the age of 120 (in some parts of the world), and every generation lives longer, so rules and lifestyles change.
So I would have to say that the Pope ordering the invasion of Ireland is worse, especially since it involved the killing of many people, and to this day the conflicts arising with Irish terrorist groups (IRA) and UK.
MONERO: I've consulted with 2 Islamic scholars on this, and Sharia does not say what you 'claim'.
2006-07-08 02:30:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
All depends on your outlook and ethos. If you are a follower of Mohamed, the invasion of Ireland, if christian, marrying a 9 year old.
2006-07-08 03:16:37 · answer #2 · answered by Bob S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think pope killing people, I'm not Muslim but I do know that before people were mature and had the liability to marry at a young age I don't see anything bad about that unless. Like he didn't hurt her or anything and apparently Muhammad has a young apperence, so yeah.
2014-08-04 14:20:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both are wrong but you got to give mohammed some credit for going from a mass murdering pedaphile to a God talk about ambitious
Warning my comments might offend and creat anger to the muslim community remember people there my opinions and may not be fact so sit back relaxe and get a grip!!!!!!!!!
2006-07-08 15:42:21 · answer #4 · answered by wardancer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are pretty sick. Sharia documents say that Muhamed consumated with Aisha when she had her first period at 9. Muhamed was also responsible for many battles against other tribes with other religions. Religion can be used as justification for all sorts of crimes, Popes and prophets are not immune.
2006-07-08 02:37:37 · answer #5 · answered by g_orwell 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
mohammed marrying a 9 yr old
2006-07-08 02:24:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sarah Palin, Rush, Glen, Fox information and Boehner might want to all tutor regret. Vitriolic speech is anti democratic. those human beings want to take duty for his or her movements. obviously the a procedures acceptable wing nuts and tea baggers see no connection between their hate speech and violence....they used this illogic to justify their hate speech over the previous 2 years. After this adventure they could no longer cover. words and speech have consequences.
2016-11-06 01:22:29 · answer #7 · answered by riveria 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope its not worse it happen in many places in history like India
There were Many oppose to stop child marriages in India
I hope its still a Mandatory thing for some people in India
I amnot supporting thi si also want to fight against Child marriages
2006-07-08 03:27:36 · answer #8 · answered by suresh m 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mohammed marrying the 9 yr. old kid. I just can't fathom it and I don't care if it was "the thing" back then.
2006-07-08 08:00:48 · answer #9 · answered by chrstnwrtr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There never was an English pope.
2006-07-08 02:40:15 · answer #10 · answered by AndyB 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋