English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And what were the reasons behind this, the quest for oil and diminishing resources for America, the idea of a New World Order - one world, one government or was it for sheer greed and wealth?

2006-07-07 23:50:26 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

21 answers

Absolutely not, more crazy talk by crybaby foreigners upset that we actually retaliated against the worst attack in American history. The internal temp absolutely WAS enough to melt steel, the planes were full of JET FUEL!! I am tired of reading "why does america hate all other countries", "GW caused 9-11". I personally think America should cut off every red cent of foreign aid except to those countries who have proven to be our friends. Actions speak louder than words, and we will see what happens to the US Bashers when we shut our checkbook. Let China and Russia feed you and provide medical care and protect you from your enemies, oh wait......they won't.

2006-07-08 01:15:21 · answer #1 · answered by yougottabekiddingme 2 · 0 0

It is so 'convienant' how it happened when it did. The recent study that I've seen really makes me wonder. Most of the jet fuel burned up in the initial fireball, so what was burning was just building material. The heat from a fire from the building materials could not have gotten hot enough to melt steel. Building 7 came down without being hit or catching fire. The plane that went down in Pennsylvania was probably meant for it. I think it could very well have been planned and carried out by the Republican party. The reason was not oil, but to drive up their membership through feelings of nationalism and the fact that they try to capitalize on patriotism. The Republican leaders would gladly sacrafice American lives to further their agenda. Reptillian bastards.

2006-07-07 23:58:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The US gvmt has much to answer for, but I do not believe that they had anything to do with 9/11. It should have given rise for an examination of their relationship with Saudi Arabia though... but that's a whole other can of worms.

The US started bombing Iraq on the quiet two months before 9/11. We know that now. So there was no need to construct an attack on US soil. The plan to invade Iraq existed long before.

2006-07-08 00:36:10 · answer #3 · answered by scubalady01 5 · 0 0

It appears so, alas it is beyond most peoples imagination of course.

As for the motive, I would say all of the above - the people in power stood to gain from it, in many ways.

Project for the New American Century (2000) -
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"

George Bush and his puppeteers policies are not new :-

"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country"
Hermann Göring 1944(Nazi)

and you can't believe a word they say :-

"I think one way for us to end up being viewed as the ugly American is for us to go around the world saying, "We do it this way. So should you."
"I think the United States must be humble and must be proud and confident of our values, but humble in how we treat nations that are figuring out how to chart their own course."
George W. Bush - 2nd presidential debate Oct 11th 2000

2006-07-08 00:01:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no.

They gov may have taken advantage or at worst turnes a blind eye to intelligence but the idea that they would kill thousands of their own people for a few barrels of oil they could easily buy is just silly. Oh, it's also quite sickening. The US got realtively stable bases in some unstable areas of the world out of 911 etc but GWB didn't make it happen. Put down the reefer and read a book or two

2006-07-07 23:54:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You have it ALL WRONG! It was the International New World Order of High Rise Building Contractors that caused 9/11....they wanted to bid on the new construction contracts.....makes about as much sense.

2006-07-07 23:55:16 · answer #6 · answered by iraq51 7 · 0 0

those "those who stay in caves" were giving secure haven to the contributors of the terrorist communities. the individuals who flew the planes were very knowledgeable and specially from Saudi Arabia. there is actual no info of any type that 9/11 became an "interior interest". once you've some furnish a link - and under no circumstances to some crackpot concept internet website - to valid sources that tutor that it became. you could't because there are not any. If there is no Al Queda why have they were given a internet website? Why are they recruiting human beings for his or her corporation? you've lots to benefit.

2016-11-30 20:45:13 · answer #7 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

It must have been for oil. Because now we are paying almost a dollar more per gallon than we were at the start of the war.

If the U.S. wanted to create a one world order we certianly wouldnt start with a craphole like Iraq.

maybe, just MAYBE.... everything going on in the governmnet isnt a conspiracy and they are actually telling us the truth. ..i know i know, thats insane!

2006-07-08 03:13:20 · answer #8 · answered by sean_mchugh6 3 · 0 0

Sure, it's easier to believe Bush was behind it that it is to believe that the same terrorists who tried to blow the WTC up under Clinton were just trying again. If it was for oil, then why is gas $3.00/gallon? Maybe OPEC did it. Let's not forget that Al Queda membership is way, way up worldwide....so why is it so hard to admit that it could actually be possible that terrorists did it?

I can't believe anyone can actually believe Bush had anything to do with it. Maybe you did it.....it's about as logical as anything else some people would believe.

2006-07-08 00:18:33 · answer #9 · answered by midnight_190884 2 · 0 0

Thats a big 'Negative' from me.
If you acctually do some indepth research into every aspect big and small, surrounding the events of that day.. You will discover facts over-rule conspiracies and media reports.
My answer is right based on my research. I have examined more than just a few images to draw my conclusion.
"The eyes of a fool witness madness ignorance. The eyes of a concious witness debatable sight".

2006-07-08 00:10:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers