should thing be shard out better
2006-07-07 23:37:44 · 23 answers · asked by GRUMPY /UK 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
should read... shared not shared sorry
2006-07-07 23:46:21 · update #1
I take it all who disagree are tight bastards
2006-07-07 23:47:45 · update #2
That's a tough one. there are certainly a whole lot of people who excel and deserve the fruits of their labor. There are a whole lot who don't pull their weight and leech off of the rest of us. Then there is a third group who get paid insane wages for doing frivolous things, like playing baseball. Seriously, that is out of whack, but I don't see many people staying away from games because of it. if we ever weed out the huge amount of corruption and waste from our government, then maybe we CAN offer everyone more benefits, like free health care and far more generous college grants.
2006-07-07 23:44:18 · answer #1 · answered by Iamstitch2U 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The world sure have enough for us all. We are not too much on earth. The God that promises to feed us all, is still up and doing that. It is man through hoarding and monopoly, policies and hatred that stored up or get to destroy what every other person can take to make live meaningful and better.
For instance, if the US can stop dumping food at the sea- the food it called excess of its demand- then those nations crying hunger will go to sleep smilling.
In equality at the trade level is also a killing factor. Our fore fathers did it better with trade by barter. We may disagree but they are never found wanting to this level. Adam Smith may also meant well, but his laizzez faire is a killer pill. Money ought to serve us, rather wea re serving money now and rather than accumulate wants and needs , we are busy hoarding money.
Because some of us are enjoying it and the military is kllling guard on this to enjoy their hoard up money, others finds it difficult to complain.
It can be better shared when the so called UN or US is either out, reformed or overwhelmed.
2006-07-08 00:07:35 · answer #2 · answered by mikail 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some things need to be shared worldwide like the masses of food we throw away every day that could be used for people in third world countries or homeless shelters etc, the same with medicine.
The reason some have more is usually a case of being born to the right parents or just a case of being born in the right country, that just isn't right but I doubt things will ever change very much.
The richer people and nations don't want to lose any of their wealth & the poorer people and nations struggle to keep their heads above water. Keeping your head above water takes all the time, energy & resources people have so how can they fight those that have the money to live the lives of ease & luxury
2006-07-07 23:48:25 · answer #3 · answered by madamspud169 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i presume you mean shared? not shard. lol
Bit of a tricky question really, if everything was shared out equally then it would just be playing into the hands of the lazy.
Where would be the incentive to try harder, work karder and better oneselfs if we knew that we could be lazy and still recieve the same as those that try if what was being had was shared.
2006-07-07 23:40:29 · answer #4 · answered by Alistair B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree in an ideal world but if you share wealth and money in an equal way then you will find that it would not be long before it ended up back with the same people.
2006-07-08 03:14:41 · answer #5 · answered by happy_hammer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I see that most people feel better about things in general if they are helping others - and sharing is sort of part of that!
2006-07-07 23:42:59 · answer #6 · answered by Tash 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who is able to work and earn should work and earn. i don't think the govt should be the one making sure everything is "shard out better", but rather that individuals should try to find people that NEED help and cannot help themselves.
2006-07-07 23:43:33 · answer #7 · answered by Meg 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The world's money should be equally shared to every country. It makes me sick when people say life is hard or sucks - you get fed and have a roof over your head.
2006-07-08 03:05:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Without sounding like a scrooge, No. I think if you earn it then you should be allowed to keep it. If you want money then you work, and to all those people who can't possibly go to work what with their bad back then hey - work from home!
2006-07-07 23:42:13 · answer #9 · answered by floppity 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
errrr... i dont get your question, but from what i can make out, it should be "Should things be shared out better?"
Well no, existance survives on balance, rich and poor.
As much as a utopian world of everyone has everything is pleasing, it is simply unrealistic and unsustainable.
2006-07-07 23:42:14 · answer #10 · answered by big_dave_x 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋