English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm sick to death of all the loyal WWE fans telling us TNA fans that our promotion is full of ex-WCW wrestlers, it's one of the most hypocritical statements ever, lets compare how many WCW rejects WWE has compared to TNA:

WWE - Booker T, Chris Benoit, Mysterio, Finlay, Dean Malenko, Regal, Flair, Gregory Helms, Vito, Big Show, Chuck Palumbo, Bill Demott, Stacy Kiebler, Torrie Wilson, Jimmy Yang, Chavo Guerrero, Eddie Guerrero (RIP), Mark Jindrak, Jim Duggan, Jimmy Hart, Hulk Hogan.

TNA - Sting, Jarrett, Steiner, Nash, Konnan, Raven.

I'll leave you WWE fans to do the math, that is if your smart enough to see that WWE has over three times the amount of WCW wrestlers that TNA has, guess it goes to show how easily WWE fans can be brainwashed.

Don't even get me started on the ex-ECW talent WWE has, if you ran WWE without any wrestler that had ties to WCW, ECW or TNA the WWE would go straight down the toilet (not that it isn't already)

2006-07-07 22:43:42 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

10 answers

First of all let me tell u one thing TNA does have more heart but worse storylines and wwe has been workin at it for alot longer and most of the wwe stars from wcw work hard to make it in WWE Ex. Rey ,Eddie, Big Show they have all made it and the rest are on there way. now as far as tna goes most of there stars tried but could not succeed in wwe(Christian a middle carder) so get off ure high horse and let us citizens have freedom of speech u dont need it

2006-07-13 20:02:12 · answer #1 · answered by the king of kings 4 · 0 0

you missed christopher daniels from the TNA list, he appeared on nitro once making him an ex WCW wrestler.

Personally i think TNA is a great show, not as polished as raw and they really need an extra hour or half hour as the matches on impact are few and often way too short. Where they win by a country mile is the pay per views, WWE would kill to have shows that good (the angle/rey/orton match at mania was pretty much a tribute to AJ/Joe/daniels)

Basically there is a limited number of wrestlers on the circuit, there is going to be a lot of chopping and changing, new wrestlers need time to become truly great which means established stars are needed to keep the ratings up and develop the new talent.

2006-07-07 22:52:13 · answer #2 · answered by enigma_variation 4 · 0 0

The problem with TNA is Jeff Jarrett. He's snorting all of TNA's profits up his nose (yes he does cocaine) He puts himself in the main event all of the time (even if he's not the champion which he usually is) And really is there any "Jeff Jarrett fans" that actually want to see him be champion? The crowd boos bad guys I understand that but when you boo'd someone like Flair or HBK back in the day it was because they're doing their job and they were bad guys you "loved to hate" but when they turned good you'd still accept them. When people boo Jarrett it's because they don't want to see him at all, and he can never be a good guy because the fans would still boo the hell out of him.

2006-07-08 03:47:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

WCW Ruled! I Loved watching it.. then NWO vs WCW was great too! The wolfpack was awesome.. and when hogan took down nash with a finger, was one of the most exciting moments of young life haha .. but.. then i hit puberty... and WWF was full of hot girls, and bad @$$ guys.. ECW BORING!!!!!! storylines in ECW are always extremely lame.. TNA has been as lame as ECW.. WCW had great storylines, and so did WWF.. WWF has maintained a slight glimmer of it's old self.. but has lost most of it.. to shiny new buff guys.. it's become more of a muscle posing contest.. than a wrestling arena... but I still have my old wrestling games, and wrestling action figures... my advice is.. if you want good storylines.. the best you can get is WWE.. sorry.. it's not much.. but they are the best... if you want good fighting.. watch UFC.. it's real.. and it's good..

2006-07-07 22:52:59 · answer #4 · answered by kerbourchardalan 2 · 0 0

Don't you think that they move wrestling talnet around so that the shows can have some new talent. Personally I enjoy HWA because it's like the minor leage of wrestling and you get to watch the next generation of talent today, online.

2006-07-08 04:44:38 · answer #5 · answered by dam 5 · 0 0

your list of wcw to wwe most started in wwe then went to wcw
On November 13, 1979, Bollea made his debut in the World Wrestling Federation

2006-07-08 01:41:57 · answer #6 · answered by Joe 5 · 0 0

good on you for saying that wwe is **** and the fans are brainwashed. tna sounds better, lets just hope thgey can drive wwe out oif buisness. good point and good question.

2006-07-07 22:49:25 · answer #7 · answered by jame_football 5 · 0 0

Are you refering to wrestling or play-wrestling? I don't think WWW or TNA represents wrestling.

2006-07-07 22:56:11 · answer #8 · answered by carwashthecat 2 · 0 0

Valid point.

2006-07-07 22:50:01 · answer #9 · answered by brogdenuk 7 · 0 0

u anger me

2006-07-14 15:14:45 · answer #10 · answered by KJ 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers