death penalty is so high profile that it will rally normally rational people to al-queda cause, better to just remove him out of the public eye and just never mention him again- no publicity=no martyrdom
2006-07-07 21:58:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by enigma_variation 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
YES AND NO'DEPENDS ON HOW THE WHOLE THING IS CARRIED OUT.Martydom"is view by many,exspecially fanatics as a way of making a name for themself.Why should anyone,with a real human feelings even admire or try to explained the sickness of another who regardless of who get's hurt acts to his own evil benefits.I think the terrorist should not even be given public recognition,like newspaper coverage,news and the likes the best that can be said about them is that they've been eliminated.Why make a martyr out of a ruthless murderer?Their trial and imprisonment should be handle out of public consumption,they should'nt be given the chance to be idolised by their fanatical fellowers.but the answer is yes and no,the death penalty will make him a martyr or not depending on how the media carry the news.Someone like Osama Bin Laden should not be trial publicly when caught.
2006-07-07 22:12:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by JahDon 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obviously we do not want to reward a terrorist who wants to be martyred with his wish. However, we don't want to start a trend of those up for the death penalty claiming they are glad to be martyrs just to get out of it. I think life in prison is just as bad, if not worse.
2006-07-07 21:54:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by madoli 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Possibly, yes. But the problem is even worse. You punish a terrorist, because he's killed. And you do so, because you think killing is bad. And you consider that bad behaviour needs to be punished. Right?
Now, if you think it's bad to kill, but you kill a terrorist for killing, what makes your murdering this terrorist any better than his murdering other people? Is this any better because the terrorist killed "innocent" people? What if those he killed happened to be thieves, rapists and corrupted politicians? Would that make his terrorist acts any better? Would that matter?
Killing is bad, no matter who kills and who is killed. And killing a killer is paying back in the same way. And that is a good definition for REVENGE. The death penalty is just REVENGE.
2006-07-07 21:57:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes but the alternative: life in prison also makes the a martyr for the cause.
2006-07-07 21:52:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by SMRTASS 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Ask the people of South Africa how they feel about Nelson Mandela. 6 million whites lived in fear of him, 66 million blacks loved him. It all pans out in the end. Even China will lose its communist ideals because life and time goes on ... unless you're Irish, wich means you hang on to ideas that are centuries old.
People should be judged on whom they kill, not on their ideals. I'm against the death penalty, I think, so no one should ever be killed by the state.
2006-07-07 22:03:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by True Blue Brit 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Maybe the terrorist should be made to sit and watch the TV footage for several hours every day for the rest of his life, and then also be made to go and personally apologise to each of the families whose lives he has destroyed, so that he can personally see the devastation he has caused and the impact it is having on survivors. Perhaps he should be made to publically apologise and justify his opinions, and then sent to prison where his life should be made as difficult and uncomfortable as possible.
2006-07-07 21:51:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Eleanora 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
he might be a martyr in muslim eyes but to the rest of the world he is just a terrorist that got what he was coming to him or should i say it
2006-07-08 01:27:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he is an Islamic then bury him with a few rashers of bacon, He is then unable to become a martyr as he will be " Unclean " in the eyes of Allah as the pig is a dirty animal.
2006-07-07 21:53:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dirty Rob 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
he's likely excellent that it will be giving them choose they prefer because that of their view it really is even extra acceptable to die for his or her reason than to stay for it. yet why ought to what they prefer or not choose have some thing to do with it? feels like we ought to hand out although sentence looks merely. And for premeditated mass homicide, the in ordinary words sentence that looks merely and proportionate to me is lack of existence. And so a techniques as martyrdom is going, those who're susceptible to view them as martyrs will accomplish that no count number number what we do. those who're repulsed by way of their moves, in spite of what they imagine of the shortcoming of existence penalty, at the instant are not all right away going to commence admiring them because they were placed to lack of existence.
2016-11-01 10:38:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋