The big bang is wrong...?

Question

If the Universe was created by a big bang then all the matter of the Universe would have made the mother of all black holes. so how could it explode?

Answer 1

There was no such a thing as the big bang. Logically, the big bang implies that time is linear. However, what really matters is not what happens during the "big bang" but... what happened before? No one can answer this question logically. Time is not linear. Time is cyclical, predestined and eternal. Then, there is always a "past" to every "present" .. there is always a cause to an effect. This is logical. The big bang represents linear time. There is no big bang in cyclical time, because cyclical time implies that there is no beginning nor end. The universe has always existed. As the first law of thermodynamics states: Matter cannot be created neither destroyed.. it only transforms.

Answer 2

How scientists could fantasize big bang it won't be hard for 'em to prove it did explode against the massive force of gravity. A bigger question would be what was there before big bang. If it was just an egg-sized universe, then where did that mass come from. If it came from energy then where did that energy come from… or whatever it was mass, energy, or something else, it must not have been there eternally and just thought of exploding one day. Even if it is true how sure are we that there was only one big bang, and not many other happning at different places all the time, each one creating a 'universe' of its own. Ok forget about multiple big bang, what was going on with our universe before big bang occurred. Did the universe exist before, and at a certain point, it started to collapse instead of expanding. If so, how many times that creation and collapse of universe going on, and when did the first cycle start. And what was there before the first cycle :)

Answer 3

This seems to be a common misconception about the big bang. In order for a black hole to form, there needs to be a drastic event in a local area of spacetime. Basically, a star needs to collapse in on itself and in the process become extremely dense. Since matter tells space how to curve, space responds by curving greatly. If you look up the Schwarzchild solution, you will find that under certain circumstances, the curvature of the spacetime framework approaches infinity. That is the hole.

Ok, back to the matter at hand. The big bang was (theoretically) a super dense, super hot conglomeration of all of the matter in the universe. The mind bending part (and a fairly important part) is that there wasn't a universe for this little seed to exist in prior to the big bang (at least not a universe that is perceptible to 4D beings). Therefore, all of the universe, including the entire spacetime framework was included in that little seed. Therefore, at no time would there be a local curvature disturbance inside of the seed as technically all of the mass in the universe would be evenly distributed across the framework. Only after the Bang, was there anything resembling empty space in which a local disturbance could be formed.

Answer 4

Well, it is a theory, you know. There is a REAL problem with the big bang concept and it is found right here in our solar system.

The problem is: When you approach the center of our planet, at the 0.716 location, were a mass able to be released at that location, and able to free-fall; that mass would accelerate to a speed greater than that of the speed of light in one second. In our sun the distance from the center of that mass where this would happen is 400 miles.

So, the observation becomes, if this condition exists within our solar bodies, what happens to the mass in the very innermost part of them? According the the big bang theory all this area should be collapsing into a black hole. But then if there were even a small black hole within our planet it could not maintain an elliptical orbit. If not a black hole, then what?

Answer 5

You are quite right, the Big Bang was a singularity in the same way that a black hold is. But the early universe at the time of the Big Bang had no matter in it at all. It was pure energy. It was far too hot for any form of even fundamental particle to condense out. That all happened later.

Answer 6

Quite possibly when the explosion occured, the univere was not existent. The singularity of the big bang could have been a black hole. The matter was made by sucking matter from a different universe. The hole was torn in the space time fabric.

Answer 7

The "Mother of all black holes" is called the singularity. All the matter in the universe into the smallest area possible.

How or why it exploded, nobody knows for sure. From a philosophical perspective, it had to explode, or you wouldn't be around to ask this question.

Answer 8

The "Big Bang" may not be correct. I tend to lean towards "Cosmic Inflation" which is less dependent on a giant ball or "something" exploding. I guess I am biased however, since I made a model of the universe that suggests Cosmic Inflation is correct.

Answer 9

Firstly, The 'Big Bang' is only a theory. There's no proven fact that Big Bang originally existed.

It wasnt a star to initiate a black hole.. when a star gets very old and dies in an explosion.. a black hole is whats left behind. It will suck everything in and form a new star.

Answer 10

It exploded BECAUSE it made the mother of black holes. Everything became so compacted that physics took over and BOOM.

Dark Energy then countered the collosal gravitational pull of the matter, and, there we go.