Do you think Germany would have had a better chance at winning?
2006-07-07 15:38:22 · 8 answers · asked by Lahmsdagr8est! 2 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
Let me rephrase...would Frings have influenced the chances of Germany winning?
2006-07-07 15:57:53 · update #1
Definitely...Germany lost total control of the midfield..
2006-07-07 16:36:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 7⤋
If Frings played, Italy would have won inside 90minutes!
2006-07-08 00:22:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it would not have made a difference. One man does not make a team. it takes a full team performance to win in competitions like this and italy was just the better side on the day! italy seemed hungrier, they wanted the ball more it seemed to me like italy had more passion on the day
2006-07-07 15:45:52 · answer #3 · answered by brett_day2002 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, you could tell italy was in control the whole game, it just took 2 hrs to score. one man would not have changed their fate because after that much play a great player is just reduced to pair of tired legs that tries not to make mistakes
2006-07-07 15:51:20 · answer #4 · answered by nickdog1212 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does the whole German squad depend entirely on him to win a game? Do the other players suck?
If the answer to these questions is yes, then the answer to your question is also yes ;-)
2006-07-07 15:56:56 · answer #5 · answered by thecatphotographer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Might have been 1-0
2006-07-07 16:37:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think will no coz Frings also not damn so good ! maybe he no so much of experience than italy !
2006-07-07 17:02:41 · answer #7 · answered by bg 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
better chance, maybe, would they have won, no.
2006-07-07 15:40:57 · answer #8 · answered by kengoward 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋