If and when WMD's are proven to exist in Iraq, which liberal do you want to confront first and why?

Question

I know many of you would say that they already have been found and I agree. However, liberals and thier wacko's will never believe it. Even if WMD's were brought to thier front porch it wouldn't satisfy them. The recent finds prove Saddam was lying to the UN and was in breach of UN Resolution 1441. Even more important, these 500 chemical artillery rounds were not disclosed to the UN as required by UN Resolution.

So who would you want to talk to first, why, and what might you say to them.

And to all the liberals that will probably throw in thier 2 cents, intelligent, informed, and relevant answers please. No emotional barking. If I want to hear that, I'll just watch CNN.

Once again, please. Intelligent answers. Are you reading g and dc girl?

And who said anything about supporting war? Let's try to stay focused on the question.

Answer 1

Hillary Clinton....because she is one who supported the effort, then withdraws her support when it becomes a political tool....
I would ask her why she takes important issues and puts up a big smoke screen to get us to look the other way...just for what she thinks is political gain. Not that she is the only one that does this.....but I just don't like that woman. OOOHHH.....I'd ask Nancy Pelosi tooo...

Answer 2

there's a keep of over 500 chemical guns, all of which we've got here upon in view that going into Iraq. to three on the left, it really is being discarded as no longer something more desirable than a baby's toy. yet I actually have sufficient stuff below my kitchen cupboard that if I mixed them jointly, i'd have a weapon of mass destruction. So i'd say this is been proved and there is not any favor to point fingers.

Answer 3

Thats a tough call. I will say Ted Kennedy because he is the oldest dog in the pound. I would tell him that with the freedom of speech comes the awsome responsability of knowing when to keep your mouth shut. He is old enough to know this by now, but apparently he needs a stern reminder. How he could have sat on so many senate commities and not learned to wait until all the facts are in is frankly staggering.

Answer 4

Definitely Cindy Sheehan.

Answer 5

I NEVER doubted that saddam had chemical and biological weapons, I was immunized against anthrax, small pox, and given a gas mask and chemical suit when I was in Baghdad. I would show them to the non coalition members that didnt send troops

Answer 6

You have got to be kidding me?

Do you know how many people are dead because of this fabricated war.

You should be ashamed to continuously support the super corrupt administration. Its not about liberal or conservative. Its about the human race and liberals and conservatives are dying in an useless fabricated war that is failing miserably.

Answer 7

First WMDs WERE FOUND 3 weeks ago, chemical warfare types
If chemical bombs are not Wepons of MASS DESTRUCTION
what are they?

The list is too long, but I 'd have to pick
that drunken big mouth Senator Kennedy first and formost.

Answer 8

When they find WMD in Iraq, I will gladly go on Larry King Live to debate the findings, along with the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus.

Answer 9

John Murtha

Answer 10

That's a very big if. Personally, I feel that if they haven't been found yet, then they won't be found, but just to go along with the discussion here. I'd have to say Sean Penn.