English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-07 14:35:24 · 12 answers · asked by OCkess 3 in Sports Basketball

12 answers

They should trade him. Every season he seems to cause some sort of problem with the Philadelphia media. You have to look at it both ways though. Iverson has given Philadelphia the best years of his career, got them to the Finals once, and kept them as a playoff contender. He is a magnificent player and he isnt afraid of anything. But he still always seemed like a problem in the locker room. I kind of think Philadelphia owes it to him to trade him so he has a chance to win a championship before he retires. He is a very gifted player and usually gives it his all. Philadelphia would be smart to trade him soon so his value is still high. Many teams would love to have Iverson.

2006-07-07 16:47:41 · answer #1 · answered by Nate 4 · 3 4

This commerce advantages the two communities properly. The Pistons have extra advantageous offensive firepower with Iverson it quite is straightforward. Iverson submit 27ppg and 7 assists consistent with game final 3 hundred and sixty 5 days, bigger apg than Chauncey. The tension that Iverson places on a protection opens it up for each individual else. The Pistons have great intensity and Stuckey is able to return in and fill Chauncey's footwear to a undeniable quantity. Neither Stuckey or Iverson are particularly the genuine element guards that Chauncey is it quite is the only difficulty that could desire to probably harm the Pistons. i think of that dropping McDyess hurts the Pistons worse than Chauncey. MyDyess presented veteran management to the Pistons youthful bench of Maxiel and Johnson who nonetheless have not particularly shown themselves. McDyess is purely some gaurantee at 15 ft, can rebound, and performs very good D. extra advantageous than something, he has coronary heart. If Iverson clicks with the Pistons nonetheless, the offense would be incredibly effective. Denver on the different hand gets an marvelous element gaurd to serve up a effective offense. If Chauncey and McDyess play the protection that they have got shown they are able to in Detroit than Denver might have a minimum of two gamers who play protection. I dont know that Chauncey and Dyess extra healthful into the Nuggets offense that averaged 110ppg final season and allow the warring parties submit 107. I nonetheless think of they get extra helpful nonetheless by way of fact the blended skills of Billups and McDyess outweigh Iverson.

2016-12-10 06:13:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes. The 76ers are getting nowhere. They need to strip down and re-build, trading Iverson for a player of equal talent that will better fit into their game plan. If I was AI, I'd want to be traded to a better team with a shot at a title. He is getting old enough now to where he can't do it all by himself.

2006-07-07 15:02:08 · answer #3 · answered by xeroxpoop 3 · 0 0

76ers' should trade out AI long long time ago. They tried to build up the team focus on AI but the truth tell us : "It didn't work"

AI not only poison for 76ers'. He also ruined others players. Chris Webber, Eric Snow are both good players before working with AI. However, due to the AI selfish style, they lost their mind and clueless in the court.

For the hope of 76ers, they should trade out AI and rebuild the team focus on Chris Webber.

2006-07-07 15:59:30 · answer #4 · answered by Notorious Guy 6 · 0 0

I think they shouldn't trade iverson because if they have a good center and foward than they can get into the playoff.

2006-07-07 15:40:57 · answer #5 · answered by DunHvAName 2 · 0 0

NO WAY! Allen Iverson is one of the best players in the leauge! The sixers are nothing without him!

2006-07-07 17:03:08 · answer #6 · answered by lildrumuboi 2 · 0 0

They would loose a great shooting guard,but we could probaly get someone really good for him like Bosh or something (I hope the Raptors are not that stupid) to trade a player that can be a star later on in his career.

2006-07-07 14:39:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No they should not he is their key player and would be their best shot at a title. If they traded him however they could get an excellent person that maybe is better but they wouldn't. So don't trade him.

2006-07-07 14:38:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They don't need him. When AI was out, the team was still doing good. He is just a hinderance to the team. In my opinion, they should keep rebuilding the team around AI2. Dalembert better be good because of his "potential talent" contract". They crazy for paying him for his potential.

2006-07-07 16:25:26 · answer #9 · answered by SomeGuy 2 · 0 0

Ups - You're probably getting a quality player in return.
Downs - You're losing the former MVP of the league.

2006-07-07 14:39:44 · answer #10 · answered by The1andOnly 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers