A friend says that they are the same thing, only from opposite sides. Is that true?
2006-07-07 14:14:38 · 10 answers · asked by Skip 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
I tend to agree with your friend. I think that we are still in the center of that black hole and because of the EXTREME slowing of time within our MASSIVE black hole we call the universe, we precieve it as a much larger size than someone outside might see it. And another thing. Who knows if it is impossible to have many MINI black holes (no pun intended) inside of a extremely super massive black hole? And perhaps even smaller black holes inside of them.
I don't think the physics community has addressed that possibility yet.
If you work out the math for mass and size of our universe I think I read once in a Scientific American article that our universe is within the paramiters of the definition of a black hole.
2006-07-08 04:33:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The big bang started with a singularity.
A black hole is a singularity.
One major difference i can think of, although they are pretty similar in nature...
First, black holes exist within our universe, the big bang started WITH the universe. The entire universe was a singularity. An infinitley dense and small object.
The thing is, not much is known about either of these things as we can only study the big bang singularity by the microwave background, and we can only study a black hole by its event horizon.
Another interesting thing to consider is that black holes evaporate, and eventually explode... bigger than a super nova.
2006-07-07 14:21:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
not at all. "the big bang" is the theoretical birth of the physical universe. a black hole is a star that has collapsed in on itself and it exceeds critical mass (the point where light cannot escape the force of its gravity) there is no "opposite side" It sounds like your friend is on acid. :)
2006-07-07 14:20:10 · answer #3 · answered by Firstd1mension 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in all likehood the big bang occured from a black hole. A truly supermassive one but one non the less.
Gamma ray bursts are rare events seen every so often by astronomers, they are the brighest objects ever seen and thought to be exploding black holes
a black hole is nohing but a huge amount of mass so huge that its gravity prevents light from escaping it.
2006-07-07 15:07:18 · answer #4 · answered by JCCCMA 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First there as to be something in order for a hole to exist. But then, there also has to be something for a Big Bang to occur.
Hmmmm.
2006-07-07 14:20:05 · answer #5 · answered by quietwalker 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i imagine this question is extra of a fowl or the Egg question. it really is already prevalent that each and every large galaxy has a "supermassive" black hollow at its middle. From this you should also come to a end/wager that the completed Universe ought to revolve round an same kind of a black hollow. it really is not available although to assert even if the vast Bang changed into the "wind" from the black hollow formation or the Black hollow changed into shaped by using the vast bang.
2016-11-01 10:07:51 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes black holes take things away
big bang makes things
2006-07-07 14:21:34 · answer #7 · answered by gomorgango 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Black hole is a star...with a gravitational pull so great that not even light escapes...
big bang is a theory that is just that a theory...depends on your beliefs...god/science...im more a science in betweener...
2006-07-07 14:20:00 · answer #8 · answered by guitar_dah_311 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
black hole is what was banged.
2006-07-07 14:28:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
wat is blackhole more info. or r u just sayin that ur brain exploded or ur head fell down?
2006-07-07 14:21:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋