You know, like Iraq. But that would make him a coward...and that can't be true, can it?
2006-07-07 10:39:54 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
First of all I cannot believe all the stupid answers you received saying that North Korea is a harmless backward country.....
Answering your question, I think that if that would be true he would have sent troops years ago.
2006-07-07 10:46:12 · answer #1 · answered by medusa morada 3 · 4⤊ 5⤋
They are indeed backward. But not quite harmless. Although Kim Jong Il does talk a big game, their technology isn't anywhere up to the game he talks. :) it is on the outside rim of possibility, that they have a missle capable of reaching perhaps, to the California coast. And we will shoot it out of the air before it gets here. THEN, George W. will invade. It will be a short war. A couple months at best. Their own people don't have the heart for it. They're starving. Eliminating their goverment and turning them over to SK would be the best thing that could happen to NK.
2006-07-07 17:44:21 · answer #2 · answered by Quietman40 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
North Korea IS a harmless backward country!
2006-07-07 17:41:42 · answer #3 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Possibly but, Bush and America have nothing to gain by going to war against North Korea.
2006-07-07 17:50:20 · answer #4 · answered by Peace2All 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No that kind of typical Democratic "cookie-cutter" approach to foreign relations is what got us in trouble in the FIRST place.
Lib's always ASSUME everyone in the world thinks and feels alike. And since they are so much "better" than everyone else they can just "engage" dictators and talk "sense" to them.
Remember the OSLO accords between Israel, Palestinians & Clinton? Millions to a hooligan who bought real estate in France for his wife and child while he immediately launched into intifada. So much for "engagement" diplomacy of Dems.
So war in Iraq is "wrong" but Bush is wrong NOT to wage it in N.Korea. Who TAUGHT KJI that he'll get a cookie everytime he has a tantrum? Democratic administrations.You people can't be pleased so thank goodness no one tries anymore.
The only "cowards" are the libs who try to pretend that dead US soldiers have given their lives for nothing. You guys CREATED this qaugmire during the 90's- quit encouraging our enemies and divulging our secrets long enough for us to WIN it.
2006-07-07 17:54:53 · answer #5 · answered by R J 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uh, dude; North Korea is a backwards little country. Their sugar daddy China is the only reason they’re still afloat!
2006-07-07 17:42:17 · answer #6 · answered by Day of Acerbity 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are a backward country every thing over there for as building and thier infrastructure is more than 70 year old falling in. road broken up no toilet etc the thing we are use to . it the Chinese who protect this idiot that why .but they know where to draw the line .also they have been warn by the usa so we will see what happen next
2006-07-07 17:47:43 · answer #7 · answered by idontkno 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree with jdmc2596 that they are a backward country. there is something to be said about a leader who would rather have military might rather than keep 15 million of it citizens from dying of starvation.
i guess that you forgot about the korean war hon. also we have nothing to gain by invading them you know like oil or something.
2006-07-07 17:46:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NK is not a harmell backwards country, it has a very large, well trained army and America know they would almost certianly lose if they went in there; like in vietnam.
2006-07-07 17:43:20 · answer #9 · answered by AndyB 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're a silly ***. If they were a harmless backward country, they wouldn't be able to fire those missiles.
I bet millions of Iraqis are glad to know what you think of them.
2006-07-07 17:42:22 · answer #10 · answered by Karen M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋