Who's "flip-flopping" now George W Bush?

Question

The idiot had us invade Iraq because he "thought" there were weapons of mass destruction there. (None were found), yet our military continues to fight on. (God Bless them by the way). Now, North Korea tests a nuclear missile launch, and George says: "Let's wait and see what happens". Surely, even the most die-hard Republican can see the idiocy of this stance?

To mikefl, I admire your attempt to justify George's actions. However, your statements are not factual. Also, if you are talking about Sept. 11; you've got the wrong Country and terrorist (most Republicans make the same mistake). Thanks for your answer.

Answer 1

He knows our military can't fight another war right now.

He also knows that they really do have WMD in NK and they might actually use them.

But mostly he knows that they do not have an oil supply that our military can disrupt to drive up the price so he can get even richer.

Answer 2

I agree with you! North Korea is a far bigger threat than Iraq ever was. Bush is not gona touch Norh Korea because they actually have an army and weapons unlike Iraq. Also, they are tight with China; who owns us. Everything is made in china! Also, North Korea has no resources like oil unlike Iraq. North Korea has already said they have missles that can reach Alaska while Sadam's missles were a joke! Iraq is so far from us that there was no chance of anything reaching us, and Iraq did not have any weapons of mass destruction. Actually Iraq had not done anything to USA! (I am sure we will get to hear they were harboring terrorists! and that was a reason to kill 100,000 innocent civilians) . Bush is not gona do a thing to North Korea no matter how much danger we are in because he is a coward,and that would actually be war instead of an invasion. He can not even win an invasion in a country which has no army. What a looser!

By the way where is that sadistic,blood thursty,hateful Rumsfeld the master mind behind the invasion! We do not hear a word from that coward!

Answer 3

Well your quite wrong there. First of all, North Korea hasn't tested a nuke, just missles. Iraq had been given OVER A DECADE to come clean and they refused. When your own intelligence agencies along with the intelligence from other non 3rd world nations tell you Iraq has WMD all after 9/11. You don't take your chances. What if they did have some and they ended up in terrorist hands? Who would you blame then, of couse it would be Bush. SADDAM NEEDED TO GO. What better time to do it. And by the way, they did find over 400 chemical weapons. Sure they were old, but Saddam said they were all gone. He didn't listen, now he's paid the price.

Aristotle: If you want to tell me where my facts are wrong, I'll be happy to show sources or say I was wrong.

Answer 4

I think Bush would like to do something more about North Korea...but it would be an even greater disaster than the war in Iraq (and that was more than bad enough!), plus he can't handle more than Iraq right now...

Iraq was much weaker militarily than North Korea, plus North Korea have China as an ally so Bush is very wary of taking on such opposition (remember the Korean war in the 1950s!).

Well, enough of my excuses...Bush is a hypocrite and a flip-flop anyway!!

Answer 5

they think of this is going to help them win elections. can not say it better than this guy: "the inducement ..... to tell such obtrusive lies is easy. they try to reclaim the post 9/11 “glory days” of the Republican celebration. the point is to persuade the yank those that for the time of user-friendly terms Republicans can shop them secure, and while a historic fact like the date of 9/11 demanding circumstances their claims, then they rewrite background accountable invoice Clinton for 9/11. The Republicans are nonetheless treating the yank human beings like they are finished idiots. genuinely everyone seems to be extensive-unfold with that Bush became president for the time of 9/11. Their pathetic attempt to alter the info must be an insult to each American. This recent super lie of the splendid is a shallow attempt to restore the politics of concern that carried the GOP to victory in 2002 and 2004." Jason Easley EdIt: and then they lie approximately asserting there have been no assaults. Bush Press Secretary Dana Perino it suggested final November. Rudy Guiliani suggested it final Friday on ABC information. Mary Matalin suggested it on Sunday. analyzing the righties spinning this may be humorous if it wasn't so pathetic. No none of those human beings suggested "after 9/11". Guiliani suggested that the underpants bomber became an act of kin terrorism, meaning on American soil or in American airspace. you will see any of those on video. and that they say liberals have a difficulty with info! The costs weren't taken out of context. seem on the movies!

Answer 6

No they can't. They believe he walks on water, so nothing he does is wrong. Invade a country with oil? Good job!!! Sit back and wait to see if a poor impoverished country who can't even make a decent missile does next. Good job. We can talk until we're blue. I have come to believe, after being on this site 2-3 wks. that it doesn't matter how much logic you present. You will not change their minds. And that's their story and they're sticking to it!!!! AMAZING aren't they?????

Answer 7

Actually there WERE, cuz we gave it to them, just not found. They hide them? Or tossed them? It was also for Saddam though, after? I dunno about that, it''s been a problem though so I hope nothing happens. Two different situations? Even if similar? But I hate him w a passion! I'm a democrat though.

Answer 8

Well put.