Do you think political voting forms should add another choice - such as: No confidence?

Question

Nearly everyone has lost confidence in politicians. They see the majority of them as greedy, selfish and power-hungry. Yet they are supposed to make rules FOR the people they serve. If we had an additional box to tick (like: NO CONFIDENCE), surely this would make them sit up and take note?

Answer 1

Yes, a none of the above box would definitely win many elections.

That way the we could have the career politicians waste their money on a campaign and neither could get into office.

But we would have to make sure that the "none of the above" candidates could not run in the second make up election.

Answer 2

Teach1 is probably correct about this. I did spoil my paper last time in fact, a local election.

A 'No confidence' or 'None of the above' box might get a few more people into polling stations but, really, we're being quite naive if we think such dissent from the political process is likely to change anything.

While a great majority complain about how the country is run, as equally large a majority don't seek any attempt to radically reform the political process or make plans for revolution or, as Goober says, set up their own political party.

I very much hope change comes and, if it is to do so, I think this 'new politics' will have very little to do with the traditional model of party politics and very little to do with Westminster.

Answer 3

I would love to see such a box but ultimatly what would it acheive I really dont believe it would bring about a major change in the quality and integrity of the candidates which is what needs to happen.
Power corrupts however idealistic any given person is ultimately they would comprimise the only way to control this is to disbar a person from standing at the next election if they are the incumbent meaning that power would be less likely to corrupt. It will never happen anyone who would be in a position to implement such would be in power therefore 'corrupt' and wouldnt surrender their power so easily

Answer 4

Yes I agree, particularly if the British Govt. persue their aim of making it mandatory to vote. Clearly if many people have no confidence then you cannot compel them to vote because the withdrawl of that vote is a statement of no confidence , and so is valid. The arguement the politicians make is that it is our duty to vote and if we do not we have no right to comment or criticise; a flawed arguement: If you are compelled to vote for those you do not trust that is ant-democratic. It is just a method they feel they need to prop up a corrupt and failing system which no longer has legitimacy. Again , yes your suggestion would fit particularly if/when they push compulsion.

Answer 5

I don't think that would prove or do anything. People who feel this way should really run for elective office. Change doesn't just happen at the voting booth. You can become actively involved in government (whether it be local, state, or national.) What are you waiting for - go for it. You may not win, but you would give some the choice they are looking for.

Answer 6

I believe that we should be offered choices, such as first, second and so forth. That way I could vote green or indy, and it wouldn't take away from the other candidates... just point out to the govenment that there really is the "other majority"

Answer 7

I think not voting at all is the best way for them to take notice!
They are all unfit for office and only after the money, power and perks that go with the job. I think this country need to abolish Government and appoint people for the job without all the pomp and ceremony that these freeloaders get.

Answer 8

I agree completely. But I can already see a down-side, or maybe it's an upside, I'm not sure. We'd end up with an election vote count of a no-confidence majority.

Answer 9

I understand your point of view, but if that's the case, wouldn't that instead nullify the power of the vote? People ***** about their vote not counting and therefore don't vote! What you're proposing would nullify the vote by not actually naming a candidate, therefore leaving us in a situation that would parallel not voting at all! Let me reiterate however, that I DO understand how you feel. You idea is a meritoriuos one, but unfortunately one that would be viewed as apathetic.

Answer 10

Yes,I certainly agree with,if ever this did come about there would be alot of embarassed candidates at the elections