SERIOUSLY!!! I know this guy who is gay and when he sees other gay guys that he doesnt like he calls them fags? Whats the difference or what does he mean by the word "F@G"?????
2006-07-07 09:23:57 · 10 answers · asked by ? 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
well in my opinion there are 2 different types of gay ppl.. the gay ppl who act like regular, typical straight people, and the "gay acting" stereotyping, the guys who walk shaking their hips, and who move their heads when they talk, or who 'act like girls'.
most gay guys who act str8 think guys who act gay are a complete turnoff and call them fags.
2006-07-07 09:32:30 · answer #1 · answered by Me lol 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Fa* is an English word meaning bundle of sticks used for kindling wood. It had a double meaning when used to refer to homosexual men. One is that many gay men are thin, like a stick and secondly in the 16th century, men were burned at the stake for being gay.
It is a disrespectful term, just like using the "B" word for a woman. Ok, young people today would even use the "B" word for a guy. But it's simply a term of disrespect.
2006-07-07 17:53:17 · answer #2 · answered by michael941260 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You cannot be serious with this question! How long did it take for you to think this up? For the most part, gay men are gay men(whether they're masculine or feminine). Of course, just like straight people call each other bitches, *******, hookers, assholes, tricks, and other degrading names, GLBT folks do the same thing. It's not cool, but it happens. And to the "holy rollers", before you pass judgement on anyone else, look at yourself first.
2006-07-07 16:34:54 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in answer to wisdoms pathetic quote..........................
Quick Notes about Scripture and Homosexuality By Margaret Evans
The condition of homosexuality:
Nowhere in Scripture is reference made to the condition of homosexuality, only to homosexual acts.
"Aren't you trying to wriggle out of what the Bible clearly says about homosexuality?":
What the Bible says about anything is selective, contradictory and liable to change in interpretation. People do not believe in " what the Bible says". People believe in traditions about what the Bible says. Judeo-Christian tradition certainly is homophobic but whether the words of Jesus are homophobic is another matter. The various Christian theological traditions are so different from one another that they cannot be identical with the words of Jesus. The believer must decide whether the words of Jesus are more important than Christian traditions. Arguing out of Christian traditions is circular.
The story of Sodom (Genesis 19):
The story about the destruction of Sodom is not about homosexuality. It is about the sin of breaching sacred hospitality.
The Old Testament prohibitions:
The Old Testament prohibitions against homosexuality in the Books of Leviticus (chapter 18, v.22; chapter 20 v.13) and Deuteronomy are essentially provisions of the Jewish Law. Those Christians who base their disapproval of homosexuality on them must be prepared to state whether or not they are prepared to keep the other provisions of the Jewish Law.
Ruth and Naomi, David and Jonathan, Jesus and the "Beloved Disciple":
These friendships, as described in Scripture, are not gay relationships. The first two friendships are about the righteousness of choosing those who are elected by God, namely, the Hebrew nation in the case of Ruth, and David in the case of Jonathan. The friendship between Jesus and the "Beloved Disciple" is a symbol of true faith and discipleship.
The Centurion's Servant:
This is one story in which a gay relationship may be mentioned. This is because the word used in Greek in the account given by Luke can mean "boyfriend"', we know that centurions and their personal servants often had sexual relations and it is stated that the centurion was very fond of the servant. If this story does mention a gay relationship, then it confirms that Jesus was less interested in what people did rather than in their faith and love.
Paul's condemnations of Decadence of the Pagan World in his Letter to the Romans, (chapter 1 v. 26-27):
This is the one passage in Scripture that mentions lesbianism. The passage condemns the pagan world for failing to observe the will of God as revealed in creation. It depends, however, on whether you accept Paul's argument that this is what the pagans are doing in the behaviour he describes. If you do not, it adds nothing to Paul's remarks on homosexual behaviour.
Paul's other condemnations of Homosexuality (1 Corinthians 6 v 9):
No-one is sure what the words used in these passages refer to. They could refer to some types of homosexual behavior but it is not certain.
2006-07-07 16:34:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing unless they repent they are both going to hell just like any other sinner.
All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God
See Romans Chapter 3 Verse 23
2006-07-07 16:28:30 · answer #5 · answered by wisdom 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There's really no difference except that f@g is one of the names used to describe girly gay guys.
2006-07-07 17:18:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Fags" (it's alright, you can say it here), is more of a degradation like the word "*** ger"
but there is no difference, unless you hate them that much.
2006-07-07 17:05:12 · answer #7 · answered by grumpyfiend 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is the same thing except i think fags act like girls
2006-07-07 16:26:35 · answer #8 · answered by confused 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's no difference.
2006-07-07 17:07:19 · answer #9 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no difference, we're all f@gs.
2006-07-07 16:30:17 · answer #10 · answered by phxguy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋