English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

That movie was too long.
And the band kept playing and playing and playing....

2006-07-07 09:33:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I didn't but the only reason is if your comparing the length of the ship to sink to the whole movie. It does because you have to tell the aftermathe of it past story the present story too.

2006-07-07 16:14:12 · answer #2 · answered by mrdgal04 2 · 0 0

There wouldn't be as much drama in a ship simply sinking as there was in watching soap opera love and such. Did you know that Cal was Rose's third cousin twice removed?

2006-07-07 16:37:16 · answer #3 · answered by Annie 1 · 0 0

uh, yeah...it's a movie...it's telling the story, and sometimes the plot exposition takes longer than it actually took the boat to sink.

2006-07-07 16:12:11 · answer #4 · answered by thetoothfairyiscreepy 4 · 0 0

Actually, if you time it from the point where it hits the iceberg, to where the bow slips under, it takes about 1 hour and 4 minutes.

2006-07-08 11:57:56 · answer #5 · answered by Scarlett 2 · 0 0

yeah, but it would have been quite boring if all they showed was the boat sinking and such. but i get what your saying.

2006-07-07 16:13:10 · answer #6 · answered by Emily! 4 · 0 0

yes it has to be because most of what they showed was happening at the same time and you can't show that many things at once on one screen.

2006-07-07 16:15:04 · answer #7 · answered by Rachel B 1 · 0 0

lol yeah, that was such a terrible movie.

2006-07-07 17:29:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh how I hated that movie ....

2006-07-07 16:12:38 · answer #9 · answered by sam21462 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers