Suppose you did not have someone to share anything with - not even the girl/boy at the checkout counter. Not ever. You could only say 'yes' or 'no' when you had so much more to say to others. How would you handle it?
2006-07-07 07:19:20 · 8 answers · asked by solisue 2 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
Of course, you could live. You would change your habits. I've spend some years alone without sharing anything and learned a lot on the inside. Then again, I've worked among people whose consciousness was entirely different from mine and I couldn't get my ideas across. That was frustrating, but it taught me patience and the ability to listen to others. I also have had the experience of living in a country where I didn't speak the language at first and it took quite a while before I could get some ideas across. Great lessons to be learned, though, in different situations.
2006-07-10 06:18:19 · answer #1 · answered by roadscholar22 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So, enable me start up by using declaring that is the finest element I have examine on Yahoo! solutions. maximum of that's undesirable, yet you've actual were given form. that's certainly a start up, and nicely worth persevering with. You had some awkward sentences and misspellings, yet not something significant. Oh, i don't like the names, although. No offense. they're in simple terms too...i do not understand the note, so i visit bypass with 'available.' that is now to not say they should be classic, I in simple terms sense like authors continually use ridiculous names. It irks me, haha. At one factor you position 'simeon' by hazard truly of 'arion' (i believe). What about Simon for the boy? Sorry, i'm getting stuck up on names. both way that become fantastically good. i'd easily save doing what you're doing. good success!
2016-10-14 05:29:22 · answer #2 · answered by jesteriii 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that would be so bad. I have so many more conversations with myself than I ever do with people. The only question is, do I still have to listen to them, but can't give any feedback? Cause if we are all silent, that would be bliss...
2006-07-07 07:29:55 · answer #3 · answered by val schmal 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't think we could live that way. i mean our system is based on compromise and interactions. interactions depend on conversing with each other...i doubt we could ever establish ourselves if the only thing we can say is "yes" or "no". lol and if comflict arise..forget that...no way to resolve it lol
2006-07-07 07:23:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'd go crazy cause i love to share my opinions
2006-07-07 07:23:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO WAY!!! Especially considering how addicted I am to answers!! I'd go mad!!!
2006-07-07 07:22:43 · answer #6 · answered by zharantan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure I could handle it. I don't think it would be so..........
Ahhhhhhhh! Dang it! Ya' got me!
2006-07-07 07:35:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i wouldnt be able to live...that's for sure...we are not self-sufficient, we are interdependent....
2006-07-07 07:23:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋