Yet another terror attack stopped, when will you admit Bush is doing something right?

Question

If you try to respond with, "Have you watched Micheal Moore's Farenhiet 9/11" you should no longer be allowed to answer questions.

how do we respond when kids at a high school, "just talk about killing people" they are arrested. I have seen the whole thing. I am proud because they are stopping attacks from radical Islamist when they are just talking about the idea.

Answer 1

First I am not against Bush. To Me that means being against Our Country. He was elected by the majority of registered voters, not once, but Twice, even after the War had begun. My guess is that most of those who complain, either, l) did not vote, or 2) actually voted for Bush.

Yes another terror attack was stopped, and I applaud the fact that You have brought that to the forefront. And it was stopped in the beginning of the process. Got to be on top of things to accomplish that. And no He did not do it on His own, but He did however surround Himself with People He felt were qualified to do the job well, and to keep us safe.

If We have a President that won't fight back, they call Him weak, and when We have a President that will fight back, They call Him, well You have read the questions, You know what They call Him.

I honestly think that He could stop 100's of terrorist attacks, and probably already has, and Some would never be happy.

Answer 2

HMMMMMMMM what terrorist attack was stopped? The 1983 WTC bombing happened right after Clinton got into office and he successfully prosecuted the people who done it. And he didn't blame Pappy Bush either. He successfully prosecuted McVeigh for the Oklahoma City bombing. 8 years of stopping attacks and not invading countries that had nothing to do with WTC 1. When are you going to admit Clinton done things right!
LoveItorLeaveIt, in the 2000 election Al Gore won the popular vote.
So in that election the majority voted for him. Bush had the presidency handed to him by the Supreme Court.

Answer 3

I will give them credit for stopping low-grade terrorist plans. Talking about it is bad, and they should be punished. It sends a strong signal that we will not tolerate it.

However, in both instances, the groups were merely discussing the possibilities. Neither group had concrete plans, funding, explosives, or organizational plans.

The agencies involved have done a good job.

BUT, when you claim that they've stopped an attack, it's like saying they've chopped down an Oak when they merely dug up a seed. Both good (well, I suppose if you don't like Oak trees), but two entirely different things.

Answer 4

Terror attack or terrorist-wannabe? So far the only evidence for either recent arrest is a bunch of talk.

Meanwhile, the CIA unit dedicated to finding Osama is closed. Why? Americans would personally go to great lengths of energy-conservation and belt-tightening to see Osama pay for his crimes.
The whole goal of Bush's middle east policy is protection of our oil supply - whether as a self-serving grab for Iraqi oil fields or as an effort to put a new military base in Iraq to replace the one taken out of Saudi Arabia. We shouldn't be sacrificing young American lives for either effort.

The most effective route to ending mid-east terrorism is to quit buying their oil.

Answer 5

You should watch Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. OOps!

I guess that means I am no longer allowed to answer.

Answer 6

I actually were to both places and that i'll allow you to comprehend at present from own journey that Iraq is now a digital hellhole, I even do not comprehend what we were attempting to do there yet i'm really particular it wasn't what we've, the speed of killings and terrorist assaults has remained really a lot a similar because that 2007 the in ordinary words rationalization why we imagine we've gained is because we now not deliver our troops out into the extra risky aspects, maximum US squaddies in Iraq spend their time of their heavily fortified distant base's even as US troops do project into the unfavorable aspects they get killed (like very last week 4 lifeless) as for the rustic itself that is largely in a state of civil conflict, with the U. S. gazing from the sidelines. As for Afghanistan, 1000 US troops killed in 9 years, 500 of that were killed in the astounding 18 months, which could not prevailing as traditionally you comprehend once you've gained once you end dropping adult men, if we are now dropping extra adult men at a speedier cost than ever beforehand that is secure to assert they are nevertheless very a lot in the strive against. me in my opinion I say get each and every of the females and boys out now beforehand we lose anymore, because each and every lack of existence is a waste of our merely excellent scuffling with adversarial to their very worst.

Answer 7

Please did you read the WHOLE report???? An on line talk between idiots who couldn't find their a-----s. No money, no real sense,no real ideas, just talk . So now lets see. That's 2 non-plots ( the guys in Miami didn't have any money, explosives or solid plans, just a bunch of wannabees) and WMD's that were old, rusted and inoperable. And they were the ones WE gave them via R Regan. Wow!!! is GWB doing great or what?????

Answer 8

Have you seen Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 911? You should watch it. It may just change your views on President Bush.

Answer 9

I'm glad a terrorist plot was stopped, thanks to the work of many international groups.

" U.S. officials worked closely with Lebanese authorities and other foreign law enforcement and intelligence partners to uncover the terror network, according to a joint statement from the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. "

I'm glad someone is doing the job. I'll give credit where it's due.

Answer 10

You are so right!!! People keep complaining that Bush is so bad and is going to get us killed, but he has managed to prevent that from happening several times. It'd be alot different if John Kerry was in power.
Love you,
GOD BLESS AMERICA