Should police officers be allowed to put 50,000 volts of electricity through a person using a taser?

Question

More and more often, police officers are using tasers on citizens for minor reasons.

Here is 1 videoclip of a citizen getting tasered for a minor reason.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/news/video/taser_video3a.html

Answer 1

For minor reasons, no. But for dangerous criminals or people on the effects of drugs and/or alcohol, I think it's a better way to stop and arrest them than the old fashioned gun and bullets.
This way at least nobody dies or gets serious hurt.

Answer 2

I even ought to fully trust Kenora. For countless months I actually were monitoring taser use (or extra acceptable placed abuse) and the consequences of being tasered and performance got here upon that being tased is as risky as a shot from a police issued sidearm for those in risk. absolutely everyone with a neurological or heart situation ought to not be struck with a taser. absolutely everyone on multiple prescription drugs or severe on lots of the available highway/leisure drugs ought to not be tasered. Pregnant women human beings, absolutely everyone less than 19 y/o or over 60 ought to not be tasered. So why with this variety of vast quantity of those that are in risk from being tasered ought to an places of artwork have this variety of weapon? With this variety of vast quantity of exclusions to who ought to correctly be tasered (in ordinary words about 20% of the inhabitants can 'appropriately' be tasered), how can an adrenaline severe officer make certain if taser use is proper??? i do not learn about the police with the taser of their fingers, yet i am going to't see a heart situation, neurological situation, 1st time period being pregnant, or comprehend what prescribed drugs someone is on.... perchance they are implanted with some variety of detection equipment on the academy?!?!? For some reason many police officials do not do not ignore that they don't seem the regulation; the courtroom is. Many police seem to imagine they are decide and jury and prefer the video confirmed if one would not do because the 'decide' orders then you definately will be assaulted previous to arrest.... and previous to a real trial with a real decide...

Answer 3

Absolutely. The police serve and protect. Without them, criminals would run rampant and our society would live by the rule of survival of the fittest. That lady had no right to disobey the officers -- in fact, she had a RESPONSIBILITY to obey them. She chose not to, and she suffered the consequences. Police officers should NEVER have to apologize for doing their jobs, and people who have never served in law enforcement have no business telling police officers how to do their jobs. If it's a choice between a police officer getting hurt/maimed/killed or someone who is disobeying the law getting hurt/maimed/killed, the choice is simple.

Answer 4

How many times did he state "Get out or I will tase you!"?

Seems to me, the lady should have shut up and hung up the phone so she could actually listen to the cop.

I wouldn't put up with that BS from her either.

But don't worry, I'm sure Jesse Jackson will be there any minute to play the race card for her.

Answer 5

It's either 50,000 volts or the cop shoots the person. Another alternative is the cop is shot by the person. Of course it's all right.

Answer 6

Actually voltage is not as dangerous as amperage. I believe the number as low as 20 milliwatts of Amperage will stop your heart.

Answer 7

we don't utilize the taser system in our department, but it does the job quicker and less messy then pepper spray.

and the long lasting effects of pepper spray arent there.

Answer 8

yes of course

Answer 9

It's better than a 9mm bullet.

Answer 10

yes