2006-07-07 03:50:31 · 31 answers · asked by teambargain 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
yes knowing my luck i would go to jail for braking it
2006-07-07 03:55:27 · answer #1 · answered by nightsky1331 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yep,
I think that there should be a law against "fortunes and greed".
Think about it....
If these "celebrities" didn't endorse brand "X" products for zillions of dollars.
Brand X company wouldn't have to sell their lousy product (that the Celebrity Person endorses so you think the product will make you better,sexier, hipper, younger, healthier...) for twice as much money (usually to satisfy the greedy investors)...
Therefore, regular people would choose to buy a better product, rather than some over-hyped, overpriced lousy product.
But, our soceity says it's ok to have an unlimited bank account.
Do we really need to have people earning millions of dollars for moving a ball around or singing (often without talent -- Britney Spears. Why is she famous?)
Couldn't the money go to improve the environment? Feed the homeless pets? Save the Manatees?
2006-07-07 11:04:05 · answer #2 · answered by pukcipriavroc8v 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I think of it all the time. There are several things I believe there should be laws against.
I was in Florida 2yrs ago and there wasn't a bar or restaurant anywhere that you could smoke in. I do not smoke, but the people I was with all did I felt bad for them but was glad I could breath fresh air the entire time. Once back home I realized that I really liked the fact of people not being allowed to smoke in public places. I get tired of going home smelling like smoke, but then again I subject my self to that environment and that's what happens. So I understand that there needs to be two sides to laws, the people who agree and the ones who don't I guess its just the way it is.
2006-07-07 11:03:08 · answer #3 · answered by Tigger7 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, there should be a law against a lot of things
2006-07-07 10:53:17 · answer #4 · answered by GD-Fan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More often I think the opposite: There should be no law against that.
2006-07-07 10:56:59 · answer #5 · answered by webfly2000 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! There should be a law against old hairy men who wear speedos at the beach!!! They should only be allowed to wear them at home in their own pools providing they have a high fence!!(Yes I know it is wrong but you laughed, right?)
2006-07-07 11:00:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I try to think it through, i mean what if there were a law against it, am i willing to pay for more police to enforce it? Am i willing to lobby for it and send letters and visit my legislators? I try to think through the consequences of the law i'm considering. To see if it would really be worth it for me and society.
2006-07-07 10:54:13 · answer #7 · answered by Sufi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! Against wearing socks with sandals!
2006-07-07 10:53:51 · answer #8 · answered by psykhaotic 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All the time.
But what can you do, the law makers won't make a law against anything they want to do.
2006-07-07 10:52:56 · answer #9 · answered by You may be right 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, there should be a law against stupid people procreating.
2006-07-07 10:52:38 · answer #10 · answered by Dark Light 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
where do we go with this
would it swing around a nd infringe my life
but yeah
no cell phones while driving
no loud music booming from pimped autos
no traffic cops directing traffic jams
no stupid people at 7/11 as employees
no dropped cell calls
need i go on
2006-07-07 10:59:43 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋