definitely no. because the soil in the moon has no moisture so the foot prints will not be clearly seen. but in the photo the foot prints of neil armstrong was seen as seen when he steps on a clay. so its clear that it was a studio set up by the usa to make other feel that they were stronger than ussr
2006-07-07 06:12:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Oh come on!
None of the conspiracy theorists who think we didn't go to the moon can give any concrete evidence to back up their claims.
Everything they say like the flag is flapping is not a sign that it is fake but a sign of their misunderstanding of science. The flag was flapping because the pole was vibrating as they drove it into the planet, with no atmosphere to stop the flag it carried on moving. There is an explanation for everything that the conspiracy theorists see as a sign.
People say "you can't see the stars" if you take a photo at night on EARTH you cannot see the stars, just because you are on the moon doesn't mean that the camera works differently.
Radiation can be stopped by lead and metal.
The cameras were custom built for space, the had a large focus and a large button to take the pictures. They were very simple decvices and could be very easily used in a spacesuit.
Some conspiracy theorists say that the shadows are wrong but that's just their ignorance. There is nothing wrong with the shadows in the pictures.
I've probably missed something but thats all I can be bothered to write.
Are we supposed to believe that we don't have the technology to go to space? If you think this bonk yourself on the head with your club and have another try at inventing the wheel.
Jessica- it's not the government it's NASA, get facts before you try to make accusations.
What do you idiots mean "we'll never know" we have known since the 60's you morons.
2006-07-07 16:25:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Skull 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. During three of the moon landings, astronauts set up reflector arrays which are used even today to, among other things, measure the distance between the Earth and the Moon. Positioning the arrays correctly through autonomously would have been close to impossible at the time.
In about 2008, the Indian space program will send up a lunar satellite to carry out high-resolution mapping of the surface. The camera should be powerful enough to show the Apollo landing sites, and offer conclusive proof that they occurred.
2006-07-07 21:25:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by ndcardinal3 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The crap about the flag waving in the vacuum so it must have been a hoax is just that: CRAP. The flag had a stiff rod across the top of the flag to keep it unfurled in a vacuum. The cloth hanging down did what ANY material will do, particularly if there was no air to stop it. It swung a few times after it was opened. However once it stopped it did NOT start moving again unless the flag or pole was touched. No air to move the flag. It was on the Moon!
2006-07-07 09:34:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dick Tracy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Men definately landed on the moon and just to shut the people who said that the landing was faked, the flag never waved but it stood up because of a stick on top of it, the stars aren't there because the camera was focused on the astronaut, the cosmic radiation can be stopped by metal and a suit, and the astronauts probably brought a timed camera to take the picture of the space thingy taking off.
Can you read this all in one breath?
2006-07-07 10:42:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Eric X 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Man did land on the Moon. A hoax that big about such a well publicized and documented event involving so many people could never be kept secret. And the FOX TV program calling it a hoax was just a load of crap by people who do not know the first thing about space flight or science.
2006-07-07 09:27:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, If It was a fake they got millions of workers to keep their mouths shut all these years. I really don't think the conspiracy theory can any longer be taken with anything other than a pinch of salt. All their arguments have been shown to be total nonsense. Do I think man landed and walked on the moon?...Most definitely.
2006-07-07 14:39:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by greebo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hi,
Well, if not than a set of people are "monsters" on this planet...
If those things are fake, then even the rest of the explorations are fake! It must make sense. Further more they did not just land on the moon. There are some 'secrets' they did not reveal on the show...
Karl
http://www.freewebs.com/smithkarl/DaveBlogs.htm
2006-07-07 13:47:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by James B 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I definitely think that man landed on the moon.
2006-07-07 09:21:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Princess 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course men land on the moon. Just common sense prove it.
I don't have the time, nor the patience to answer fully, but you can go to this link. http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html , there you can read all the false "proves" that men didn't land on the moon debated.
2006-07-07 14:54:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by fcompari 1
·
0⤊
0⤋