English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

If absolutely necessary. But we have not reached that point yet, and we are a long ways from it. Diplomacy should be given a lot of time to work, and if necessary, a surgical missle strike to eliminate military targets without any kind of invasion should be used.

2006-07-07 02:10:12 · answer #1 · answered by bmwdriver11 7 · 0 1

Due to our presidency, it would be no in Bushes case. It would not be wise to become a combantant with one of our oil resources. Keep in mind that majority of this war is over oil. Sure we call Iran and Iraq endangerment zones, but why shoot your business partner, when you can make money with him? N.Korea ran a test on their Nuclear Missiles which was not permitted by the United Nations. Which makes this illegal since flight coordinates has to be sent in and a destination at least 300 miles from civilation to avoid casualties. Same thing with the U.S. and the Atom Bomb. In the U.S.A, we have deserts and areas where we can test our weapons, nothing but desert in New Mexico,Nevada and other desert regions of the U.S.A.

2006-07-07 09:17:37 · answer #2 · answered by titantakeover03 2 · 0 0

i don't know...
both of the two side feel 'threaten' each other..
if USA seek military action.. N.KOREA / iran will more even feel 'threaten' that will make them to develop their nuclear..
just like us, human and animal.. we can be wild if we feel 'threaten'..

what i think is we all as humankind and united nation seek for peace action for those countries..

yeah, i know.. it sounds a bit idealistic and unrealistic..

2006-07-07 09:14:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Does nto matter what we think. Dumbya is gonna do whatever he feels like doing regardless of how many die. Give him or his daughters a rifle and put them on the front lines or in a front line unti and see how often he stands up to "tyrany".

I mean if he does do a preemptive strike against N Korea and they nuke 1 or 10 of our cities Dumbya will be safe and sound in a bunker.

He lies and we die.

2006-07-07 09:12:05 · answer #4 · answered by khan_frozn 2 · 0 0

And what exactly has Iran or North Korea done to provoke military action? Are you trying to be sarcastic?

2006-07-07 09:40:54 · answer #5 · answered by The_Dark_Knight 4 · 0 0

It probably wouldn't be smart to be fighting in 3 countries at once. But then again I have no idea how much our military can take.

2006-07-07 10:07:39 · answer #6 · answered by Cherokee_pride 3 · 0 0

No- we must learn from our mistakes and I think that preemptively invading Iraq was a mistake. Also, they both have nukes and they are both led my people who are bordering insane. I don't think that we should make these loonies feel desperate enough to actually use one.

2006-07-07 09:11:35 · answer #7 · answered by Princess 5 · 0 0

Iran yes Korea notice those troops it shows marching Kim cannot arms his troops or they would shoot his silly butt

2006-07-07 09:10:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We should start today.

2006-07-07 09:26:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers