plz send me the answer of these questions.
2006-07-07 00:31:09 · 3 answers · asked by Racky 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
The U. S. did not involve themselves in it because the U.S. congress did not want to involve themselves in European politics. The President at the time did, congress did not let him. With the U.S. out of it, England soon left, and Japan never joined. But between the three of them they did agree on a limit of Battleships, (not carriers) and Japan being at war since 1932 with China, Korea, etc, soon took the lead. Basically without countries willing to enforce the edicts the League tried to pass, it failed.
2006-07-07 00:40:47 · answer #1 · answered by redhotboxsoxfan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The League of Nations failed because the United States never even joined the fledgling group. Pretty pathetic considering the League was President Wilson's idea.
2006-07-13 17:29:34 · answer #2 · answered by anthony25_80 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The primary reason is there were no provisions for enforcement of League decisions. Without the threat of military action, rogue nations (Italy, Germany, Imperial Japan) felt they could act as they wished. They were right.
The lack of participation of the US was not, in my opinion, fatal as the US had little military power and interest in affairs outside its own hemisphere. (The First World War was an exception.)
2006-07-07 03:00:42 · answer #3 · answered by jim 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋