Is your party complicit in the unrepresentative electoral system called "democracy" in the USA?
http://www.gregpalast.com/stealing-mexico#more-1439
2006-07-07 00:29:54 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
P.S. I believe Bush is obviously the most corrupt
2006-07-07 00:32:23 · update #1
Don't know??
2006-07-07 00:35:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Al Gore? Remember Florida, he did what he could. now he's pretty much out of politics. John Kerry accepted the results recognizing the inevitable. In Ohio, his vote total was behind by so many and the uncounted votes totaled a smaller number. So he accepted the vote and hoped that by so doing he would still have preserved a chance to run again, unlike Al Gore.
2006-07-07 07:37:13 · answer #2 · answered by quikzip7 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gore didn't. He went to the Supreme Court, who declared that the ballot count was to continue. Then Secretary of Payoffs Katharine Harris gave the election to Bush with even completing thr recounts.
I don't know if the election of 200 was stolen, but many (questionable) things happened, and the wrong guy won, whether or not he actually won.
2006-07-07 07:55:22 · answer #3 · answered by amg503 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you can believe as you wish but it would be good if you had better facts.
GWB as all have made some stupid mistakes.
However the reason Gore didnt push the buck was because though there may have been some less than honest goins on the cost of a more proper recount or something else was far to great,and in the end Gore still would have lost.
2006-07-07 07:38:01 · answer #4 · answered by PSG_30127 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unlike Bush, they understand that petty power struggles are detrimental to the progress of our country, and conceding rather than pursuing showed their greater maturity.
P.S. I am sorry that they didnt pursue it further, because who knows how many people in New Orleans or Iraq would be alive today if they had won?
2006-07-18 20:19:55 · answer #5 · answered by EF 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Billionaire Kerry was intimidated by Bush's Millions.
It probably would have juiced up their fanatical left wing base but it would have made them look like liars and fools if they hadn’t.
2006-07-07 07:35:25 · answer #6 · answered by Raylene G. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats politics, you can't do anything about it. there was probably a plan b/w bush and kerry and al gore he's out of politics. you know man and bush is not all bad, he's fine for me
2006-07-07 07:41:02 · answer #7 · answered by Raveesh 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the Democrats follow the law not ignore it like the Republicans. Oops, I better watch out, my computer might be tapped!
2006-07-18 00:06:52 · answer #8 · answered by jim w 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Supreme court decision
2006-07-07 07:33:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe he realised he was dealing with giant coproprations and no matter what he does they would alwasys warp things to make bush the victor.
just a guess
2006-07-07 07:32:42 · answer #10 · answered by johnny_zondo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
thats waht moveon.orgasm and michael moore and soros would have you believe...just look up the independent studies by 6 universities have found after 6 different re-counts...giving the victory to bush...election fraud??? lmao...philly, detroit..chicago...florida..all dem fraud....catch up!!!
2006-07-07 08:11:32 · answer #11 · answered by bushfan88 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋