English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

NO.

2006-07-05 22:11:59 · answer #1 · answered by debraj_roy_dr 2 · 0 0

The short answer is maybe. The hypothesis of time travel is there but all the components have not been tested and verified.
Scientists believe that a very intense magnetic field might have the the ability to distort time and space, which may allow an object to travel forward or backward in time.
The only way we can get close to creating a magnetic gravitational field of the required strength is the Z Machine in the United States. Scientist advocates of the hypothesis are trying to convince those responsible for the machine about the validity of using the Z machine to test the ideas but a lot of background research needs to be completed before this happens.

2006-07-13 02:12:12 · answer #2 · answered by craigy 2 · 0 0

Time travel seems to involve movement at close to the speed of light and big distortions in the space-time continuum. I have to agree with my uncle AL that we are not going to get up to the speed of light very soon if ever. However...

Light IS something that travels at the speed of light AND it is something that could be bent by a large disturbance in the relatively ripple free continuum of space, such as a black hole.

Imagine a scenario in which a beam of light containing an encoded message is directed to such a locale from earth. It passes close to the event horizon and is bent back to where the earth was BEFORE the message was sent. A receiver that would be much easier to build than a gigawatt laser would pick up the signal years before it was sent.

We could encode messages about hurricanes, earthquakes, the election of the Bush family and other disasters that may befall the planet. Oh yes, you may want to encode winning lottery numbers so that you can afford to build the gigawatt laser to send the messages after you receive them.

I actually asked Kip Thorne the world famous physicist about this and he said it wouldn't work, but I would sure like to give it a try...any takers? It could make a believable science fiction story at the very least.

2006-07-13 03:50:08 · answer #3 · answered by sleeplessinslo 2 · 0 0

Will humans be able to make a time machine? That one I don't know, nobody knows the future. Can humans make a time machine? Definitely not, if not everyone will already be crazy over time travel.

Anyone what do you mean by time machine. A clock can be a time machine, it tells you the time.

2006-07-06 06:30:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A participant in a game who selects from among her strategies randomly, based on some predetermined probability distribution, rather than strategically, based on payoffs. Simply, a nature player allows the introduction of uncertainty or randomness into a game.

Generalizations are divided into the time line, regularity detection, and redundancy elimination. The time line contains the data on which generalizations are based. Regularity Detection uses the contents of the time line to draw generalizations about experience. Redundancy Elimination improves efficiency by identifying processeing steps that are unecessary.

As you know, You can build a time machine, oppourtunity to do this is available to you based on the machine of generalization that I have described.

2006-07-06 05:38:48 · answer #5 · answered by Qyn 5 · 0 0

The time machine is a mere word frame derived from OBE"S (out of body experience).
Einstein had a theory, but dies before he could finish his work. I personally believe that he had an out of body experience and witness the fact of visually seeing a current picture that was 3 thousand miles away and come to find out it was true and actually happened and he was there to see it and get back into his body in less than 15 seconds. That flight brought about the time machine theory, but actually time in space can be felt when one aquires the OBE"S, It is something not to mess with unless your very educated about it. The longer you're out of your body the harder it is to get back in. You could end up a vegetable for the rest of your life playing with the tree of life. So my advice is very simply leave it alone unless you are truly serious about an experience you will never forget. OBE"S give us the ability to capture a scene currently taking place...a witness to a crime or even murder. It pays to keep quite even if you have the ability to oversee and have the premonition to aquire the fact. I was in the plane that went down in Sandiego a PSA Flight carrying 300 people that all perished. I woke up in a big sweat telling my friend what had happened. It was on the news when we turned on the TV....end of story

2006-07-06 05:19:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Does time have any direct physical effect on any physical thing? Is time the definitive reason for any change in the conditions of reality? I don't think so.
The fact that there is matter and it moves among other matter creates the concept of time, but time itself has no physical factors. It simply adds an information about the movement of things that can be compared with each other; the moving of a second hand on a watch, or the sun coming up each morning and disappearing on the other side of the sky each day. Time is a mathematical concept, not a physical entity.
We as humans can capture the past only in the scope of our media to be able to look at video and audio that was recorded to represent being there but only from a camera's eye view of the past recorded and viewable in it's own perspective only. Movies like Lord Of the Rings portray the ability to use two of the five human senses to relate a story. A fictional story made up sights and sounds that were recorded and resynchronized by some manmade mechanical device in order to be played back in seeming real time with each other. Sounds that are created from a physical event such as someone speaking, travel away (out into space) at a different speed than the light is reflecting colours back out into space. Light and sound separate and become diffused or unfocused as the affect of the action loses energy. Using devices to travel in space and record sound travelling through space would be one way to capture the sounds of the past because I think it is or will be possible to build a vehicle that can travel fast enough to be able to catch up to a sound that originated here on earth and has been traveling through space over a period of time but sound is the one thing between light and sound that loses energy faster than the other. Light theoretically cannot be caught up to by anything in order to be experienced or recorded in any way after the fact. If you could catch up to light in order to record an image or video of what had just happened before, even that ability doesn't even come close to being able to actually exist in a time that already happened. Being able to capture all the affects of a physical interaction would still not enable us to reassemble the things we've captured in to an experience that is actually happening. You might even be able to capture the remnant energies and project them into a dream that some body has but the dream no matter how accurate and realistic is only a dream and has no physical effect on the world out side of the person's dream. At the time an event happens is the only time that it has any affect on the real physical world. Except for those effects that it has on reality in order for you to experience it in the first place. All those factors you can sense will all dissipate and abate as they travel past you and other physical matter and they all travel at far different speeds.
My final argument that I think proves that we or anybody will never discover a way to actually travel back to a time that happened before the time that they are living in. I think if it were ever going to happen in the future, they would have come back and told somebody in the past how to do it sooner and so on and so on until the point that a time where we would ever even be curious about the future and time travel would never exist. There would be no people discussing it's possibility because it would be a common everyday occurence. considering what it is we're talking about here, I say it never was invented and therefore proof that it never will be. We'd already know all about it.

2006-07-06 06:22:58 · answer #7 · answered by J M 1 · 0 0

I say we can only move into the future and watch our past. To move into the future, you just kind of freeze yourself. But don't try it at home because you can't go back. To watch our past, you go a bunch of lightyears away and wait for the light to arrive. I don't think we'll be able to interact with it. And like many people always point out: if we could go back into the past, how come we haven't seen anybody from the future?

2006-07-06 05:12:53 · answer #8 · answered by Martin S 1 · 0 0

Government has already been working on time distortion and time travel for the past 30 years.

Even a proven theory that time travel is possible by bending time. We've proven it but only at like the .00000001 second level. Well that is the level that us civilians know of.

2006-07-06 05:10:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You'll need to refer to the experiments of Nicola Tesla and decide for yourself. One experiment was called 'The Philladelphia Experiment'. Ignore the film, it's a load of bollocks.

Hope you can find what your looking for.

2006-07-06 05:11:38 · answer #10 · answered by Todd's 3 · 0 0

it's impossible..why? we cannot go back to the past anymore.. past is past.. can u imagine.. HOW in the world we can generate a time machine.. probably another planet earth can be built but.. time machine..? it is just an imagination...

2006-07-06 07:37:31 · answer #11 · answered by †eRicK...! 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers