The smallest in size would be a neutron star, which can be only 10 or 20 kilometers in diameter. Needless to say they are very dense. A cubic centimeter of their material can weigh over a million tons.
If you are referring to mass, the smallest stars have a mass of about 8.5% of our sun.
2006-07-06 00:46:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by longhairabsalom 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
A search of Google turns up several candidates for the smallest known star. Here's a couple --
A star orbiting the star designated OGLE-TR-122. It's only about 16 times larger than Jupiter ==> http://www.planet-surveyor.com/article69.html
A star known as LP944-20. 120,000 km in diameter ==>
http://www.earthsky.com/shows/listenerquestions.php?date=20041001
2006-07-06 05:10:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Chug-a-Lug 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no way to know we cannot possibly find them all. But a Neutron star would be the smallest, unless you include black holes. They have a singularity at the center.
Here is some info on star classes.
2006-07-06 05:02:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Not Tellin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh, some of the midgets from the "Wizard of Oz" might count,,,,,OH YOU MEAN STELLAR BODIES? :D
About the size of an atom. Everything you've ever seen is recycled star explosions- your body, rocks, this planet, the computer screen in front of you.
Stellar evolution is like this: God created it, time burned up the stars from T Tauri, burned thru main sequence, red giant phase, white dwarf, brown dwarf, black hole, the black hole then evaporates by going thru a worm hole, and then being puked out somewhere else in the universe. And the cycle starts all over again- now this is pretty abbreviated but this is the basics. Sometimes stars explode- and the cycle is modified by collapsing all over again into new planets, etc
2006-07-16 12:33:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mini-Me is the smallest star.
2006-07-16 01:09:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tiffany33 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tom Cruise
2006-07-14 13:57:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Answer King 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The one that you can fit five hundred of on the head of a pin!
2006-07-06 05:05:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jimmy Pete 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Look at :
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7098
2006-07-15 19:45:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by thewordofgodisjesus 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't know but try google or some search engine
2006-07-17 19:08:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
mercury
2006-07-06 05:03:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by maryam 2
·
0⤊
1⤋